Search found 136 matches

by CDJ
Thu Oct 06, 2022 10:41 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Finally got to post about this, after a very challenging 5-year journey!
Screenshot 2022-10-06 103149.jpg
by CDJ
Thu Sep 15, 2022 2:12 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Alright so Planning Consent has been given the green light, but in a quote from the Advertiser: " JWDT must submit details of external materials and finishes with the government architect and a stormwater management plan before development approval is granted. Once complete, the building, know...
by CDJ
Thu Sep 15, 2022 2:05 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

rev wrote:
Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:38 pm
If this gets built I'll base parachute off the top of it in the nude.
Some forum members must be getting a little nervous!
by CDJ
Wed Sep 07, 2022 3:51 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

SA 1 tower for approval at the next SCAP meeting. Was originally planned at 67 level 227m Looks great! Let's hope it gets approved with no issues. Originally planned at a 67 level 227m building though - what happened? Was this deemed to be too tall for this part of the city because of flight paths?...
by CDJ
Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:18 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

I assume the ‘announcement’ referenced by CDJ is different than the laughable Tiser article and is still to come? That's correct! The Rupert Rag is just embellishing what's in the public lodgement notice. Render will be released when the client is ready. I had assumed a few days, but I think it's g...
by CDJ
Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:08 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

https://i.postimg.cc/NM1Z08YT/City-Building-Heights.jpg Nice work. In reality the flight procedures, which currently determine max building/crane heights for most of the CBD, are complex. It isn't really possible to interpolate/extrapolate anything definitive about future allowable heights across t...
by CDJ
Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:33 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Algernon wrote:
Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:55 pm
It looks like a phone exchange and a tyre and auto?
:hilarious: :hilarious: :hilarious:
by CDJ
Tue Jan 18, 2022 10:01 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

The difference between SA1 Tower and previous tall proposals for Adelaide is that in this case the work has actually been done with regard to aviation. Previous proposals have made no attempt to do so and therefore had no chance of ever being approved at DA stage. This is the first time we've had a...
by CDJ
Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:03 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Nort wrote:
Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
The king returns: Capture.JPG
Hahahaha - I couldn't believe it when the Advertiser published that horrendous photoshop :hilarious:
by CDJ
Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like. What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away? Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I thi...
by CDJ
Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:30 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

The difference between SA1 Tower and previous tall proposals for Adelaide is that in this case the work has actually been done with regard to aviation.
by CDJ
Tue Jan 18, 2022 1:04 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | ~195m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Recommend changing thread title to SA1 Tower and height to 180m :wink: :shock: Any hints when public unveiling will be coming? Imminently - the client and architects lodged with SCAP before xmas. I guess SCAP have been on leave and now in the process of releasing this publicly. It's an exciting tim...
by CDJ
Tue Jan 18, 2022 12:22 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | ~195m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

55 levels is closer to 180m than 195m
by CDJ
Fri Sep 10, 2021 2:02 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Replies: 466
Views: 152194

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

The project is still alive - just moving forward carefully. Significant news will likely be in Dec. Will provide info when I can, but that will likely be at the same time as some information is public anyway. Just to chip in on the discussion earlier about earthquake: one of the common public miscon...
by CDJ
Thu Jul 01, 2021 11:54 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: New City Arena
Replies: 301
Views: 53808

Re: New City Arena

A question: why are people so outraged about the $600m for this stadium, but are totally fine with the $10b (that's $10,000m) being spent on a tunnel for one road in our city? Think how many incredible building projects could be funded with that money, along with increased spending on health, educat...