Apologies Grand Central Hotel not Hotel Adelaide cnr Rundle St and Pulteney St.
See Adelaides Greatest Losses
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... 47&start=0
Search found 573 matches
- Tue May 22, 2007 3:05 pm
- Forum: CBD Development
- Topic: [U/C] 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
- Replies: 1237
- Views: 392083
- Tue May 22, 2007 2:51 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b
- Replies: 734
- Views: 165024
The cultural tourism elements were already in place at Port Adelaide. They just needed to be identified and re-presented instead of bulldozed. The new buildings should have been constructed around the old. This can not be done at the macro scale the large South Australian developers work on when the...
- Tue May 22, 2007 10:56 am
- Forum: CBD Development
- Topic: [U/C] 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
- Replies: 1237
- Views: 392083
[U/C]
Was demolition of the exhibition building for a carpark progress? Was demolition of Hotel Adelaide for the Hungry Jacks carpark progress? The planning process is still a democratic process but in this instance that process was not followed. Neighbouring properties would have benefited more from a 3-...
- Fri May 18, 2007 9:37 am
- Forum: General Development Discussions
- Topic: News & Discussion: Adelaide Urban Sprawl & Density
- Replies: 139
- Views: 95748
This is the challenge for our planners, developers and architects. How do we accommodate people like Rhino without marching our suburbs ever outwards gobbling up this states best agricultural land. What happens when the paddock Rhino looks over gets subdivided and he loses his view? We need fixed ur...
- Thu May 17, 2007 4:13 pm
- Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
- Topic: [COM] Oaklands Crossing | $174m
- Replies: 843
- Views: 232546
[COM]
One thing I learnt from working in a petrol station for 5 years is never underestimate the laziness or stupidity of the general public.
- Thu May 17, 2007 2:28 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussions
- Topic: News & Discussion: Adelaide Urban Sprawl & Density
- Replies: 139
- Views: 95748
Just checked Wikipedia and I was wrong about the area but right about the relative densities. Singapores density for the entire country (not just the city) is 6,369/km2 more than 10x our 615/km2. Imagine Adelaide in an area 13km x 13km which I would guess to be Portrush Rd to Tapleys Hill Rd and Cro...
- Thu May 17, 2007 2:13 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussions
- Topic: News & Discussion: Adelaide Urban Sprawl & Density
- Replies: 139
- Views: 95748
- Thu May 17, 2007 11:55 am
- Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
- Topic: [COM] Oaklands Crossing | $174m
- Replies: 843
- Views: 232546
[COM]
Having seen the plan for the interchange and the land available the possibilities seem immense. A little dream. The Govt sells the rights to develop a shopping centre incorporating a supermarket etc around and above the interchange. Perhaps bus interchange, shops etc at ground level, car parking at ...
- Tue May 15, 2007 10:56 am
- Forum: The Pub
- Topic: Most users online
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2601
Most users online
I just noticed that the most users ever online was on a saturday night in the middle of the festive season. What does this say about forum users?
- Tue May 15, 2007 10:14 am
- Forum: CBD Development
- Topic: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
- Replies: 3030
- Views: 829070
- Tue May 15, 2007 9:21 am
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 63032
- Tue May 15, 2007 9:05 am
- Forum: Regional Development
- Topic: #Official Energy Thread
- Replies: 228
- Views: 111028
This is the link to the company's website. It seems to simply be a tracking system with diffusers (or concentrators?) above the pv cells to maximise efficiency. Sorry for the vagueness bat as you can probably tell I'm no scientist.
http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/
http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/
- Fri May 11, 2007 2:58 pm
- Forum: Regional Development
- Topic: #Official Energy Thread
- Replies: 228
- Views: 111028
- Fri May 11, 2007 12:14 pm
- Forum: Regional Development
- Topic: #Official Energy Thread
- Replies: 228
- Views: 111028
The current energy debate appears to be should we replace our coal powered electricity stations with Nuclear power or renewable sources. Conservatives say the renewable sources can't provide the response to demand required by industry and homes because the sources of renewable energy are unreliable ...
- Fri May 11, 2007 11:55 am
- Forum: Regional Development
- Topic: #Official Energy Thread
- Replies: 228
- Views: 111028