Cruise wrote:I just don't believe the immense cost justifies the means.

do you think spending $100 million on AAMI stadium justifies the means?

^ i agree. no money should be given to the SANFL to stay where they are. its money wasted. it wont make a difference to their bottom line unless they bank it. that money doesnt even include that which is being spent on the pointless rail extension spur to West Lakes. just let them be at AAMI and the...

this Advertiser article, is it old news? was it written as a result of the game on Wednesday night? we already knew that AAMI needed money spent on it to fix up the FIFA standard shortcomings. I expect the government will say as much and that the $100 million will be adequate to meet the minimum req...

See now think of this, lets say there no Geelong in the AFL, I would like to see a business case to set up a new team there. It would not add up. yet they do well (off field that is) Just like how a Tasmanian team would well i dont think Demetriou has ruled out Tasmania from having a team in the AF...

the AFL use future population projections eg for the next 30 years, to prioritize where to focus their funds and expansion. while i would like to see Tasmania get a team in the AFL, the figures i assume just dont add up when compared with the huge population increases SE QLD, Western Sydney and Pert...

i dont think there will be any opposition to it as they are not building any new buildings and, well really they are not doing a hell of a lot to the park. just some wetlands, removing some buildings, beautifying the heritage grandstand that is already there, i can see how that could amount to $8 mi...