#VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

Ideas and concepts of what Adelaide can be.
Locked
Message
Author
Hippodamus
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:31 pm

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#211 Post by Hippodamus » Thu May 07, 2009 3:19 pm

why not put the new hospital where the entertainment centre is = good transport connection

and put convention centre / casino / hotel / fnb / retail / sporting / public space, etc etc over the railway yards to make it a mixed use inner city destination.

? works for everyone i think

User avatar
adam73837
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: The wilderness being sustained by nutrients in the air and powering my laptop with positive energy

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#212 Post by adam73837 » Wed May 13, 2009 7:08 pm

Cruise wrote:A high school student saying they are 'stressed' :roll:
Did you endure the IB? I don't think so, particularly because there are only a few schools in this state that offer it. It's like going from Year 10 to Year 11 1/2 or Year 12 and Year 11 is hard enough to go into from Year 10. Perhaps you should consider that before you make such statements Mr Cruise! :roll:
BTW, I'm aware that the world outside school is much harder and less sympathetic than High School, but I'm sure you recall your days as a Year 11 (specifically in the first half of the year) and how much of a leap it was! If not, well that's your opinion on Year 11, not mine, so don't criticise me for enduring the first of the big leaps in the business-end of my education!

Anyway, getting back on topic, has MR responded yet cruel_world_00? It's very interesting seeing how he reacts when pressed for information about his... disliked :) proposals. :lol:
I take back many of the things I said before 2010; particularly my anti-Rann rants. While I still maintain some of said opinions, I feel I could have been less arrogant. I also apologise to people I offended; while knowing I can't fully take much back. :)

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#213 Post by Cruise » Thu May 14, 2009 4:41 pm

I did 3 year 11 subjects in year 10 so no, i didn't notice a big leap. Although i did leave school at the end of year 11 so i'm not really sure what year 12 is like. I went out into the real world instead.

User avatar
adam73837
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: The wilderness being sustained by nutrients in the air and powering my laptop with positive energy

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#214 Post by adam73837 » Sat May 16, 2009 6:57 pm

Cruise wrote:I did 3 year 11 subjects in year 10
Which ones?
Cruise wrote:Although i did leave school at the end of year 11 so i'm not really sure what year 12 is like. I went out into the real world instead.
So you finished some Year 12 subjects in Year 11 and then went to.. TAFE? Uni? An Apprenticeship?
I take back many of the things I said before 2010; particularly my anti-Rann rants. While I still maintain some of said opinions, I feel I could have been less arrogant. I also apologise to people I offended; while knowing I can't fully take much back. :)

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#215 Post by Cruise » Sun May 17, 2009 8:07 am

Australian studies, Work Education, Maths studies

I left to start an Apprenticeship

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4871
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#216 Post by Howie » Mon May 18, 2009 8:13 am

On the liberal website... Martin Hamilton Smith replied to what I wrote about Fluid City - Melbourne a City on the Move.. and how refacing the city is what is critically needed.
You make the key point that the concept is not dependent on a stadium. The central dynamic of Riverside West is that it is the best use of that area in terms of generating economic and social benefits. It's not a question of what it would cost, but rather what would be the cost of an opportunity lost. We know that the RAH can be rebuilt on its current site and still deliver the health service needs that are needed. We also know that we need to generate long term economic development in the city and this place is where it would happen. The concept plan is the beginning of a process that will give generations of South Australians long term benefits. In the short term it gives our young people a reason to stick around and get involved. Its worth noting that in Melbourne's Docklands development over a ten year period, for every dollar spent by the government, another one hundred dollars was spent by the private sector. Regards to all at sensational adelaide, Martin.

Brando
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#217 Post by Brando » Mon May 18, 2009 1:45 pm

That's a good response by MHS. His reply is really what most on here want to hear, it's a massive oppurtunity lost if we lose this site to a hospital. A stadium can be placed at various different locations in and around the CBD, but this is the site with most potential for an exciting entertainment precinct.

Good work Howie.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#218 Post by skyliner » Tue May 19, 2009 9:02 am

100% agreed.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

User avatar
adam73837
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: The wilderness being sustained by nutrients in the air and powering my laptop with positive energy

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#219 Post by adam73837 » Wed May 20, 2009 4:55 pm

You make the key point that the concept is not dependent on a stadium. The central dynamic of Riverside West is that it is the best use of that area in terms of generating economic and social benefits. It's not a question of what it would cost, but rather what would be the cost of an opportunity lost. We know that the RAH can be rebuilt on its current site and still deliver the health service needs that are needed. We also know that we need to generate long term economic development in the city and this place is where it would happen. The concept plan is the beginning of a process that will give generations of South Australians long term benefits. In the short term it gives our young people a reason to stick around and get involved. Its worth noting that in Melbourne's Docklands development over a ten year period, for every dollar spent by the government, another one hundred dollars was spent by the private sector. Regards to all at sensational adelaide, Martin.
Thankyou! That's the sort of thing I want to hear. Lots of office buildings will only do so much, but by building precincts where people can go and enjoy themselves, spend a day/ night there, etc. is the kind of thing that will attract youth to stay. On our school trip to Melbourne last year, we didn't spend the first 5 hours of our trip at Southbank for no reason... Then the last 4 hours of the trip at the Docklands... (then being awed by the CityLink, but then again many of us hadn't been to Melbourne or Sydney before and in little ol' Adelaide the most we'll see in terms of 'great transport infrastructure' are the Heysen Tunnels, the Adelaide Railway Station and the Gallipoli Underpass -BTW, I hate to tell everyone this, but Sydney beat us to it in terms of naming something after the ANZACs, ANZAC Bridge :) : )
ANZAC_Bridge,_Sydney.jpg
ANZAC_Bridge,_Sydney.jpg (1.32 MiB) Viewed 3001 times
Don't you just love the apartments on the Waterfront in the foreground. (And the oil tanker :wink: :lol: )
I take back many of the things I said before 2010; particularly my anti-Rann rants. While I still maintain some of said opinions, I feel I could have been less arrogant. I also apologise to people I offended; while knowing I can't fully take much back. :)

User avatar
Pistol
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#220 Post by Pistol » Thu May 21, 2009 1:28 am

Er what about Anzac Highway??
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken

User avatar
adam73837
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: The wilderness being sustained by nutrients in the air and powering my laptop with positive energy

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#221 Post by adam73837 » Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:19 pm

Pistol wrote:Er what about Anzac Highway??
Ahh, touche. However the ANZAC Bridge is more well-known that ANZAC Highway. ...OUTSIDE of South Australia. :lol:
I take back many of the things I said before 2010; particularly my anti-Rann rants. While I still maintain some of said opinions, I feel I could have been less arrogant. I also apologise to people I offended; while knowing I can't fully take much back. :)

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6392
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#222 Post by Norman » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:53 pm

Are you sure about that? Because up until you mentioned it, I had never heard of the ANZAC Bridge before.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5523
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#223 Post by crawf » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:59 am

adam73837 wrote:
Pistol wrote:Er what about Anzac Highway??
Ahh, touche. However the ANZAC Bridge is more well-known that ANZAC Highway. ...OUTSIDE of South Australia. :lol:
Anzac Highway has been around alot longer than the Anzac Bridge in Sydney.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#224 Post by jk1237 » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:25 am

I always have to stop and think about what they mean by the 'Anzac Bridge' in Sydney. If someone calls it by the original name of Glebe Point Bridge I then know what bridge they're talking about

peachy
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: #VIS: Riverside (Entertainment Precinct)

#225 Post by peachy » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:39 pm

Probably of interest to followers of this thread, as you are probably pro keeping the RAH on current site, thus freeing up the railyards for an entertainment precinct:
(sorry if you read this on another thread as ive replicated the message on a few related topics, just skip it as they are all worded the same)

The Save the RAH Action Group is holding a public sausage sizzle in Rundle Park (end of rundle st, where garden of unearthly delights is held for the fringe).
It is on Sunday 21st June (this sunday coming) at 11am until 2pm. According to the website it will have invited speakers Vickie Chapman MP(Opposition Heath spokesman), Senator Nick Xenophon and Mark Parnell MLC. Health Minister John hill was invited but unfortunately unable to attend.

I think by rocking up is probably the best way (and cheap/easy) to send Rann the message that the railyard RAH is not supported by the community, both medical professional and wider public. With a liberal, independent and green (Parnell) it would appear to be a cross party gathering so don't be put off if you think it will be a liberal rally, thus, hopefully accessible even for labor supporters who still disagree with this one policy.
Writing on forums like Sen-Ad is great to develop my own views and hear other's points of view, but i know ive always been interested in doing something like attending this to actively show my support and am guessing there are also others on the site who share this ambition. Its clear (especially in adelaide) that interest groups (for better and worst) can sway the political process, so might as well use this often harmful tool to progression for an act of good (IMO). If there is a big crowd its going to make the news and get further towards page 1 in the tiser, thus it will be harder for Rann to spin. If there is a poor turn out, i guess the public does support the new railyard RAH and this is how the gov will interpret it.

All this info i found on their website, http://www.saverah.com.au There is more info on the site also and you can join the site to show your support (get their membership number up) and then get emailed news updates.
See you Sunday.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests