rhino wrote:I think all of us on this forum need to accept the fact that Aiden has the answer for everything, and there's no use putting forward any of our ideas because they're all flawed. The sooner we all realise this, the sooner he'll go away, or at least stop being so damn obnoxious.
Aidan wrote:Is there still the problem of prostitutes on Churchill Road causing traffic congestion?
Aidan wrote:fkj wrote:i am aware, and have made a much more thought out design, as that previous design was useless
here is the pic where i actually switched my brain on,, and wasnt over tired and hungover![]()
blue roads are the only roads i would want to pass through the parklands, too open up the parks and make them more useable
Your plan would further isolate the parklands from the suburbs, making them far less usable! Upgrading these roads to a nonstop corridor was proposed decades ago, and rejected for good reasons. But this is the worst version of it I've seen - all the traffic entering would be diverted through some already busy intersections! And why would you want the Bakewell Underpass to be abandoned?
If you were looking to kill off investment in our CBD, this would be the way to do it!
rhino wrote:The main problem with that route - and it's similar to the route that currently exists - is that it's a ring-route around North Adelaide as well. For a ring-route to be effective - that is, for traffic to actually choose to use it rather than go straight through Adelaide - the northern bypass needs to be between Adelaide and North Adelaide.
fkj wrote:rhino wrote:The main problem with that route - and it's similar to the route that currently exists - is that it's a ring-route around North Adelaide as well. For a ring-route to be effective - that is, for traffic to actually choose to use it rather than go straight through Adelaide - the northern bypass needs to be between Adelaide and North Adelaide.
The only problem with this is the river torrens.
Aidan wrote:Is there still the problem of prostitutes on Churchill Road causing traffic congestion?
Hooligan wrote:fkj wrote:rhino wrote:The main problem with that route - and it's similar to the route that currently exists - is that it's a ring-route around North Adelaide as well. For a ring-route to be effective - that is, for traffic to actually choose to use it rather than go straight through Adelaide - the northern bypass needs to be between Adelaide and North Adelaide.
The only problem with this is the river torrens.
Yeah, lets move the river somewhere else
fkj wrote:where are previous plans for this?
rhino wrote:I think all of us
rhino wrote:on this forum need to accept
rhino wrote:the fact that Aiden
rhino wrote:has the answer for everything,
rhino wrote:and there's no use putting
rhino wrote:forward any of our ideas
rhino wrote:because they're all flawed.
rhino wrote:The sooner we all realise this,
rhino wrote:the sooner he'll go away,
rhino wrote:or at least stop
rhino wrote:being so damn obnoxious.

AtD wrote:rhino wrote:I think all of us
My
AtD wrote:rhino wrote:on this forum need to accept
biggestrhino wrote:the fact that Aiden
griperhino wrote:has the answer for everything,
isrhino wrote:and there's no use putting
trying
AtD wrote:rhino wrote:forward any of our ideas
torhino wrote:because they're all flawed.
understandrhino wrote:The sooner we all realise this,
postsrhino wrote:the sooner he'll go away,
splitrhino wrote:or at least stop
likerhino wrote:being so damn obnoxious.
this.
fkj wrote:AtD wrote:rhino wrote:I think all of us
My
Ones like thisAtD wrote:rhino wrote:on this forum need to accept
biggestrhino wrote:the fact that Aiden
griperhino wrote:has the answer for everything,
isrhino wrote:and there's no use putting
trying
are even worseAtD wrote:rhino wrote:forward any of our ideas
torhino wrote:because they're all flawed.
understandrhino wrote:The sooner we all realise this,
postsrhino wrote:the sooner he'll go away,
splitrhino wrote:or at least stop
likerhino wrote:being so damn obnoxious.
this.
and get annoying the longer they get
Straze wrote:The Willunga Railway Line was closed down and dismantled in 1969, the corridor as now been constructed as a bike path. In the last 10-20 years the area around the former railway has seen substanial growth. Since the line closed buses are now the only means of public transport in Old Reynella, Morphett Vale, Hackham and Seaford, there are increasing number of buses just to keep up with the capacity needed during weekday peak periods. The State Government predicts South Road usage to rise by 6% every year untill 2020, the Southern Expressway is fine now but with more people moving into the area it will soon reach full capacity, so thats why i believe there needs to be decent improvements to public transport in the area. The Noarlunga Centre Line unfortunely is a bit off centre to serve people in Old Reynella, Woodcroft, Morphett Vale and Hackham, you cant just keep sending buses to these areas because at the end of the day this will mean traffic jams in the CBD due to buses waiting to get to the bus stop. Thats why i think it is important to extend the Tonsley Line to Hackham to help move the commuters more quickly and efficiently. After Tonsley the line would head south running either alongside the Southern Expressway or use the existing corridor to Old Reynella then along the former Willunga Railway Corridor to Hackham, to make this possible some properties will have to be compulsary bought out and demolished to make way for the railway. From the start of the existing branch at Ascot Park to Hackham will be double track, stations will be: Darlington, Old Reynella, Woodcroft, Morphett Vale and Hackham, Tonsley will be moved further south and renamed Bedford Park.
Return to Visions & Suggestions