Page 1 of 1

[VIS] 177-179 Victoria Square | Alternate Vision

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2018 9:20 pm
by Nathan
Obviously a moot cause, but just stumbled upon this architecture competition from last year for the GPO site.
Bee Breeders announced the winners of the Adelaide Creative Community Hub competition, challenging designers to propose an innovative, vibrant public space for the city of Adelaide, Australia. Participants were required to design either a temporary pavilion or fixed landmark within the frequented public park. Competition submissions seemed to focus on one of three things: a flexible open program, half building/half landscape, or a temporary pavilion. Judges looked for a clear concept. Winning projects have the potential to do more than merely bring people together; they go a step further sparking innovation in creative communities.
More details on the competition website, and coverage on ArchDaily.

First Prize:

Image

Image

Image


Second Prize:

Image

Image

Image

Image


Third Prize:

Image

Image


Student Award:

Image

Image


Festival State Award:

Image


Honourable Mention:

Image

[VIS] Re: 177-179 Victoria Square | Alternate Vision

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:05 pm
by Linderkov
I want to know the results of the contest. Who wins?

[VIS] Re: 177-179 Victoria Square | Alternate Vision

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:15 pm
by baytram366
I like a lot of these designs but the location is wrong. A lot of them would look great in the southern half of Vic Sq where the old tram terminus used to be.

[VIS] Re: 177-179 Victoria Square | Alternate Vision

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:47 pm
by rev
That cathedral structure would have been awesome.

[VIS] Re: 177-179 Victoria Square | Alternate Vision

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:06 pm
by urban
Linderkov wrote:
Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:05 pm
I want to know the results of the contest. Who wins?
The one that had first prize written above it.

[VIS] Re: 177-179 Victoria Square | Alternate Vision

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 10:03 pm
by ghs (but alot worse)
All of these are horrible. The designers should be fined for “disorderly conduct”