serca wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:21 pm
The churches can't not be ok with it, how many priest have been found out to be gay and gay abusing pedo's
The church needs to sweep their own porch.
Being gay in the church and being a paedophile are two completely different things. Please do not equate them.
I realise now i think a majority of people on here dont mind old mate wearing his lipstick and high heels to work on any given day. And how dare me for saying I don't agree with it. So be it he is a adult que sera sera: . But Rev is right this safe schools program is insane. Do some actual research on it. In Australia we are well behind US , Canada , South America and more so Europe in this new curriculum of the education system. The safe schools program in Australia was enforced by members of a Trans gender movement within La Trobe University in Melbourne. The curriculum's main object is to educate Primary school children on Gender identity. The fundamentals of the text is that we are assigned an agenda at birth decided upon our genitals. From there we are conditioned to become that gender. This education seeks to remove this so called conditioning and educate children that despite their natural genitals gender is actually formed in the mind during childhood. Therefor children should be educated and encouraged to explore both genders before making a decision. This is happening people . Throughout Europe especially. Built into our education systems without parental acknowledgement. Commented on here saying this education is not as bad as being taught about God ???!!? This is seriously ok ? Your defending this ? Weather the children are to straight or gay couples they shouldn't be subject to this for too many reasons. I don't have an issues with gays at all or them being united or even married but this I believe this is in a round about way , along with other equal rights movements and political correctness gone mad it is all connected and I don't know but something isn't right..... Its a shame I personally see a link in this cos I don't have a problem with gays being legally united or even having kids but I think there is a bigger agenda , there has to be? why else would this shit actually be happening?
I think you're struggling here because you're fundamentally misunderstanding the differences between sex, sexuality and gender. Per your own insistence, do some research. If you still come off feeling iffy, consider that schools don't exist in a vacuum. They have a responsibility to educate our children about how the world is, not the world as you think it should be.
Oh and btw "I don't have issues with gays, but..." sounds a lot like "I'm not racist, but.." If the sentiment is true, you shouldn't need a caveat.
Previously I made comment on, in the US some Colleges now forbid lectures to identify people by their agenda and I was asked to prove it. Well I also don't trust any media either, but there is irrefutable proof this is happening. In fact this whole situation come to light for me by a family member studying at University of Oregon who informed me this is exactly what is happening there.
That's not 'irrefutable proof'. That's hearsay.
Rev is also correct about leftist if you want to call them that I'd say any minority or even perceived "underdog", suppress others opinions in the name of race, religion or equality or social and moral norms in their eyes. I see many examples of this. The problem is the not only are you suppressed and they are shocked, how dare you have a difference of opinion the attacks get personal. It's pathetic. They use the terms, fascist, racist, sexist, bigot, etc to suppress and push forward their ideology and agenda's
You're curiously quiet about the epithets hurled at others by Rev.
See where I am going with this ???? Kind of reminds me of a mate who would say to his wife "hey your out quiet a lot after hours" or "do you really need to get that dressed up to go to the gym" or "I'd rather you not go out tonight" too which she would retort with the very powerful and surpressive "YOU ARE BEING CONTROLLING AND THATS ABUSIVE" To which made him feel guilty into suppression...... So she used this heavy politicised moral and socialably acceptable stance to pursue her affair while he looked after the kids.
Remind you of anything "YOU ARE BEING HOMOPHOBIC AND GENDER PHOBIC"...........
Anecdotes aren't that useful but I don't think the one you've deployed here even supports your point. If that's the approach your mate took then he was attempting to control and undermine her agency to make decisions for herself. It may be why she looked elsewhere in the first place. But even if not, he had healthier and more direct ways to address a relationship decline and/or suspected affair.
And just btw, if someone is displaying an extreme and irrational hate and/or aversion to someone's sexuality, gender or race, it's not an insult to call out such a display as homophobic, sexist or racist. That's literally what those words describe.