Light's Vision & The City Grid

Anything goes here.. :) Now with Beer Garden for our smoking patrons.
Message
Author
User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: Light's Vision & The City Grid

#16 Post by Maximus » Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:29 am

AG wrote:This document discusses the reasoning for the layout generally:
Unfortunately that's now a dead link, which is a real shame because I'd started reading the document earlier this year and had meant to print it out -- was a really interesting read. Is it possible to get access to it by any other means?
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: Light's Vision & The City Grid

#17 Post by Nathan » Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:59 am


User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: Light's Vision & The City Grid

#18 Post by Maximus » Fri Jul 27, 2012 10:05 am

Thanks mate. That's awesome. Such a fascinating read.
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

SuperEgz
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:11 pm

Re: Light's Vision & The City Grid

#19 Post by SuperEgz » Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:56 am

That link went dead too. I did some googleing and found this: http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/asse ... istory.pdf.

Is it the same thing or different?

stumpjumper
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: Light's Vision & The City Grid

#20 Post by stumpjumper » Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:51 pm

The idea of a city-wide medium height limit outside the established CBD - perhaps of five levels above ground as suggested here - has some merit. The concept worked a treat for Paris, and has had some strong proponents here over the years.

I think the reason it has failed to get up is the question of how to compensate land owners who are happily, and legally, expecting that their little parcel will one day support a high rise development, with the buckets of money that will bring to them.

Any answers on that?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests