[COM] Urbanest | 59/53m | 20/18lvls | Apartments

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
spiller
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:13 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#406 Post by spiller » Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:49 pm

and who said those windows looked too small? the cladding and mini window shades have transformed the facade. doesnt look world class but it blends nicely now!

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#407 Post by Prince George » Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:57 pm

spiller wrote:and who said those windows looked too small? the cladding and mini window shades have transformed the facade. doesnt look world class but it blends nicely now!
You reckon? If the renders can be trusted, after a coat of paint on the concrete (which it seems will be grey) What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get. As much as I've liked watching this get built, I starting to think it looks terrible, especially the blue cladding whose colour seems to have come out of some office furniture. I know a lot of people on the site will disagree with me, but I prefer Spark.

Do we have some sort of allergy to colour? We have a growing assortment of really bland tones - this, Gallery, Altitude, iPad, even Conservatory, Aurora, or SA Water. So many variations on grey - please, someone, give us some strong colours!

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#408 Post by Ben » Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:36 pm

Prince George wrote:
spiller wrote:and who said those windows looked too small? the cladding and mini window shades have transformed the facade. doesnt look world class but it blends nicely now!
You reckon? If the renders can be trusted, after a coat of paint on the concrete (which it seems will be grey) What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get. As much as I've liked watching this get built, I starting to think it looks terrible, especially the blue cladding whose colour seems to have come out of some office furniture. I know a lot of people on the site will disagree with me, but I prefer Spark.

Do we have some sort of allergy to colour? We have a growing assortment of really bland tones - this, Gallery, Altitude, iPad, even Conservatory, Aurora, or SA Water. So many variations on grey - please, someone, give us some strong colours!
i think you'll find that it's because "coloured" buildings tend to age whereas neutral buildings don't stick out too much.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#409 Post by skyliner » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:21 pm

Exactly - strong colours weather and fade quickly leaving the bldg lokking rather tired. I think of the new bldg on HSQ on the corner of Grenfell st. - has a matt black wall facing west I believe.

Secondly, thanks Xara for the great photo update. High rise bldg density opposite the rly stn is looking quite impressive now.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

User avatar
Isiskii
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:29 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#410 Post by Isiskii » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:02 pm

I agree with Prince George's comments; this makes Spark look good.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#411 Post by Omicron » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:13 am

Prince George wrote:
spiller wrote:and who said those windows looked too small? the cladding and mini window shades have transformed the facade. doesnt look world class but it blends nicely now!
You reckon? If the renders can be trusted, after a coat of paint on the concrete (which it seems will be grey) What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get. As much as I've liked watching this get built, I starting to think it looks terrible, especially the blue cladding whose colour seems to have come out of some office furniture. I know a lot of people on the site will disagree with me, but I prefer Spark.

Do we have some sort of allergy to colour? We have a growing assortment of really bland tones - this, Gallery, Altitude, iPad, even Conservatory, Aurora, or SA Water. So many variations on grey - please, someone, give us some strong colours!
A side note - Aurora looks much better in person. I was beside it today (albeit in the forgiving light of dusk), and it wasn't at all bad.

User avatar
Pants
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Back Home

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#412 Post by Pants » Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:15 am

I would seriously prefer a park to this. 'Cheap' and 'nasty' are being kind. The fact that it's so prominent in the most common postcard shot of the CBD makes me hate it even more.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3567
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#413 Post by SRW » Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:12 am

The blue panelling does give it that sort of transportable home feel, but I have to say, that on its bones I don't much mind it. The lines are clean and symmetrical. Some more adventurous colour indeed would've been great, but I'd await the paint job for final judgement.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
spiller
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:13 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#414 Post by spiller » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:35 pm

Prince George wrote:
spiller wrote:and who said those windows looked too small? the cladding and mini window shades have transformed the facade. doesnt look world class but it blends nicely now!
You reckon? If the renders can be trusted, after a coat of paint on the concrete (which it seems will be grey) What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get. As much as I've liked watching this get built, I starting to think it looks terrible, especially the blue cladding whose colour seems to have come out of some office furniture. I know a lot of people on the site will disagree with me, but I prefer Spark.

Do we have some sort of allergy to colour? We have a growing assortment of really bland tones - this, Gallery, Altitude, iPad, even Conservatory, Aurora, or SA Water. So many variations on grey - please, someone, give us some strong colours!
perhaps its not the ultimate outcome, but i think i can speak for many in saying it's looking better IRL now than what we thought during some of the earlier stages of the construction phase. It's not an achitectural cherrub, however it is budget student accomodation afterall.

This building btw has a large impact on the skyline from the west too (have recently moved from prospect to torrensville), it has prominence from both my old CBD approach and my new, i'm not sure if that's a good thing or not.

User avatar
Xaragmata
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1613
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Adelaide / West
Contact:

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#415 Post by Xaragmata » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:09 pm

SRW wrote:The blue panelling does give it that sort of transportable home feel, but I have to say, that on its bones I don't much mind it. The lines are clean and symmetrical. Some more adventurous colour indeed would've been great, but I'd await the paint job for final judgement.
You won't have long to wait. Part of the North Tce facade has been painted in similar shade to Polites & Roma Mitchell buildings either side.
Looks much better. (Was after sunset when I saw it tonight, so may look different in daylight)

User avatar
Xaragmata
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1613
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Adelaide / West
Contact:

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#416 Post by Xaragmata » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:54 pm

From Thursday - not sure about the cladding, but the paint job is giving it quite a good look without clashing with the adjacent buildings:

Image

Image


http://xaragmata.cable.nu/album/adelaid ... _0838.html

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#417 Post by Wayno » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:45 pm

The render for this building included 'architectural shades' on those tiny front wall windows - wonder if they are yet to be installed, or dropped from the spec?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#418 Post by monotonehell » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:29 pm

Wayno wrote:The render for this building included 'architectural shades' on those tiny front wall windows - wonder if they are yet to be installed, or dropped from the spec?
Only the North Tce facing ones were to have a little horizontal sun shade over them. The Bank Street side is pretty much to spec now. So what you see is almost what you will get.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#419 Post by ghs » Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:39 pm

I know this building has copped some criticism (especially on the skyscrapercity site) but I think
it will be really good once the painting is done. Might end up looking similar to conservatory.

ricecrackers
Banned
Banned
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#420 Post by ricecrackers » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:07 pm

yikes :shock:
If 50 million believe in a fallacy, it is still a fallacy..." Professor S.W. Carey

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 231 guests