[COM] 74-80 Light Square | 31m | 8lvls | Office
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
Floor cycle is around 11 working days....Norman wrote:They're not mucking around, are they?
-
Uncle Monty
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Adelaide Hills
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
The first row of orange / bronze cladding is now visible on this building from Light Square on the top (highest) level. Sorry no pics at this stage.
-
ozisnowman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
Would have been a reasonable building had the ACC not ****** it up and reduced it to stump its like the councilors in the ACC have a fobia about heights
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
Check out the news from today and you will be a happy man I think!ozisnowman wrote:Would have been a reasonable building had the ACC not ****** it up and reduced it to stump its like the councilors in the ACC have a fobia about heights
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
Even though the ACC rejected the original 13 level proposal, the state government ultimately approved it anyway.ozisnowman wrote:Would have been a reasonable building had the ACC not ****** it up and reduced it to stump its like the councilors in the ACC have a fobia about heights
The 8 level building which was built is just a commercial reality. In the current financing environemnt, buildings which do not have nearly full or full occupancy do not receive funding.
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
Thanks Will. More diplomatic than me. I was going to say keep your uneducated Adelaide now comments to yourself and do some research before making a comment in future.
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
That isn't entirely true. A lot of the time the developer isn't willing to put up the cash either. It is easy to blame the banks but if developers would put there money where their mouth is more developments would go ahead IMOWill wrote:Even though the ACC rejected the original 13 level proposal, the state government ultimately approved it anyway.ozisnowman wrote:Would have been a reasonable building had the ACC not ****** it up and reduced it to stump its like the councilors in the ACC have a fobia about heights
The 8 level building which was built is just a commercial reality. In the current financing environemnt, buildings which do not have nearly full or full occupancy do not receive funding.
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
Very few developers actually have the money in hand.Waewick wrote:That isn't entirely true. A lot of the time the developer isn't willing to put up the cash either. It is easy to blame the banks but if developers would put there money where their mouth is more developments would go ahead IMOWill wrote:Even though the ACC rejected the original 13 level proposal, the state government ultimately approved it anyway.ozisnowman wrote:Would have been a reasonable building had the ACC not ****** it up and reduced it to stump its like the councilors in the ACC have a fobia about heights
The 8 level building which was built is just a commercial reality. In the current financing environemnt, buildings which do not have nearly full or full occupancy do not receive funding.
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: U/C: 74-80 Light Square | ~30m | 8lvls Office
But Will, Ben, Waewick... the State Government pays for skyscrapers ... you know that.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mattblack and 25 guests