[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#91 Post by Ben » Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:51 pm

Dog wrote:
how good is he wrote:Makes me feel quite sick that the govt is paying $900,000 in prizes for this design competition...it was an unrealistic deadline they gave (as if major companies/architects could drop everything and produce much better with little notice and in a 1-2 month deadline.)
The thing is the govt doesn't know what they want there....and I doubt they have the money to develop it properly anyway....it should just be advertised internationally for tender and hope some billionaire will develop it (but they would probably want a second casino license to make it work.)
Perhaps both you and the Advertiser should read the brief and understand the process before espousing this shit, over 140 Architectural firms have spent thousands of hours of unpaid time developed these initial concepts, no one is getting a $900,000 prize for concept sketches. Theses concepts have been judged by an international panel, the 6 winning entries will now be funded to further develop their concepts further using public feedback and many hours of community consultation. Once again a great concept of involving the public, architects, public displays, has been trashed by poor Advertiser reporting and small minded nit wits who read the Advertisers sensational one sided negative view of the world and believe it!

As far as the $900,000 is concerned, the good will and work already submitted by the hundreds of Architects involved would already be worth several millions if we had to pay for it. The process alone has raised the awareness of Adelaide, the site, the state, all around the world. Many hundreds of people have visited the site, know more about Adelaide and contributed in numerous public consultations.

If I was a local or international Architect who had worked hard to contributed to this process and reading all this uninformed crap I would be gravely offended and probably chose to contribute else where in future.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

Have a look at the winning entries for melbournes Flinders street station competition and you may just change your mind. What we have been served up is at best mediocrity.

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#92 Post by how good is he » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:14 pm

I agree 100% Skyliner.....absolute shite concepts....no point throwing more good money or time on them imho.
to Dog if you go to the Govts own website you will see (n.15 in the FAQs) the six short listed entrants receive $100k each in stage 1 and then in stage 2 the winner gets $200k, 2nd gets $70k and 3rd gets $30k ... Total being $900k in prizes!!!
Then there is no guarantee the govt has the funds or will develop it anyway...
I ain't trying to bag the shit out of it for no reason but think it's fundamentally flawed when no-one can tell us what is actually needed/ has demand for and will add value/be a commercial success (and not just another white elephant like the Wine centre next door). Entries so far include (more) art galleries/museums and student accom. ..... pretty un-inspiring.
And I agree 100% with Ben... we have been served absolute mediocrity compared to Melbourne's Flinders Street design competition.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#93 Post by monotonehell » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:00 pm

how good is he wrote:I agree 100% Skyliner.....absolute shite concepts....no point throwing more good money or time on them imho.
to Dog if you go to the Govts own website you will see (n.15 in the FAQs) the six short listed entrants receive $100k each in stage 1 and then in stage 2 the winner gets $200k, 2nd gets $70k and 3rd gets $30k ... Total being $900k in prizes!!!
Then there is no guarantee the govt has the funds or will develop it anyway...
I ain't trying to bag the shit out of it for no reason but think it's fundamentally flawed when no-one can tell us what is actually needed/ has demand for and will add value/be a commercial success (and not just another white elephant like the Wine centre next door). Entries so far include (more) art galleries/museums and student accom. ..... pretty un-inspiring.
And I agree 100% with Ben... we have been served absolute mediocrity compared to Melbourne's Flinders Street design competition.
Agree somewhat on the point where the form must follow the function in this case. This is like the State Liberal's former plan for the Torrens Lake area, loads of orange boxes with no business case for use.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Dog
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:32 pm

[SWP] #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#94 Post by Dog » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:02 pm

how good is he wrote:I agree 100% Skyliner.....absolute shite concepts....no point throwing more good money or time on them imho.
to Dog if you go to the Govts own website you will see (n.15 in the FAQs) the six short listed entrants receive $100k each in stage 1 and then in stage 2 the winner gets $200k, 2nd gets $70k and 3rd gets $30k ... Total being $900k in prizes!!!
Then there is no guarantee the govt has the funds or will develop it anyway...
I ain't trying to bag the shit out of it for no reason but think it's fundamentally flawed when no-one can tell us what is actually needed/ has demand for and will add value/be a commercial success (and not just another white elephant like the Wine centre next door). Entries so far include (more) art galleries/museums and student accom. ..... pretty un-inspiring.
And I agree 100% with Ben... we have been served absolute mediocrity compared to Melbourne's Flinders Street design competition.
You are looking at the second stage presentations for the Flinders Street rail project, and comparing them to the first stage of the Adelaide project. Melbourne's Flinders street project had 117 first stage entrants, like in Adelaide they had about a month to prepare concepts. The winners then progressed to the second stage using their "prizes" as funds and 5 months to produce the classy presentations you are comparing the Adelaide concepts with!

I suggest you go back and have a look at Melbourne's 117 first stage entrants before being harsh on the Adelaide RAH site concepts.

And as far as museums, galleries, student accommodation, this is a public consultation project about the use of the site, there have been and are numerous opportunities for people like you to give better ideas, just a matter of contributing.









Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free
Last edited by Dog on Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#95 Post by Nathan » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:42 pm

Ok Dog, let's look at some of those first stage entrants (specifically, some of the ones that were shortlisted and later developed). As you can see, they may have been limited to three boards as well, but even at that first stage they had been developed a lot more, and had considerable more thought applied.

HASSELL + Herzog & de Meuron: 1, 2, 3
Eduardo Velasquez + Manuel Alejandro Pineda + Santiago Medina: 1, 2, 3
Zaha Hadid Limited & BVN Architecture Pty Ltd: 1, 2, 3

User avatar
omada
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Eden Hills

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#96 Post by omada » Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:20 am

I'm confused! Why they are even producing renders at this stage? Where are the complete "holistic" proposals? I agree with most posters - form follows function, I do hope the entrants have considered this, the proof will be in the next stage i'm sure. Lets not despair just yet, although I do agree there are grounds for concern.

User avatar
Pants
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Back Home

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#97 Post by Pants » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:48 am

Have finally had the chance to see those that didn't make it and there are some really interesting and striking concepts there. Have to say though that I haven't had the time to read the brief so can't say much about the extent to which they meet it.

It does appear though that at this stage, the judging panel aren't all that interested in amazing architecture, which can and will be refined through the process, but the general ideas put forward. The overall winning contribution is likely to end up quite different to that entrant's first proposal and it's a different story altogether what (if anything) ends up getting built.

What I was expecting however, was to find out who was on the judging panel and see that they were a bunch of government reps who would not have the slightest clue about design. If you look at it though, it's a very impressive group who know exactly what they're doing. I'm happy to give them the benefit of the doubt for now and see what comes out of the process - as hard as that might be when one of the shortlisted entries has a faux mountain complete with faux snow FFS!

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#98 Post by cruel_world00 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:45 pm


Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#99 Post by Patrick_27 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:40 pm

Why do almost all the concept designs have a spider somewhere amongst? I don't understand...

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#100 Post by Nathan » Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:22 pm

Patrick_27 wrote:Why do almost all the concept designs have a spider somewhere amongst? I don't understand...
That's Maman by Louise Bourgeois > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maman

It's moved around a bit, starting at Tate Modern and then going to, amongst other places, Guggenheim Bilbao & Mori Art Museum (where I saw it a few years ago), and it's now permanently at the Qatar National Convention Centre. As a fairly famous sculpture, it seems to become a bit of a go-to for architectural renders of public spaces. Balloon Dog by Jeff Koons also seems to be used in a few of the concepts as well.

dsriggs
Legendary Member!
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:18 am

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#101 Post by dsriggs » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:08 am

cruel_world00 wrote:OOOoooOOOoooo pretty shiny render.

http://inhabitat.com/adelaide-green-cul ... kyscraper/
This isn't actually terrible, so it's a runaway leader at this stage.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3067
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#102 Post by rhino » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:35 am

It would be soooo cool to have one of those Maman sculptures in Adelaide!
cheers,
Rhino

serca
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#103 Post by serca » Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:10 pm

[img]upload%20failed[/img]

Here is one of those sculptures in Rappongi Hills Tokyo. It is massive! I never new what it was.

The Mori Tower in the background is an amazing building itself . Skydeck is not as good as Tokyo Skytree but still great views , with massive foyers

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#104 Post by Nathan » Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:23 pm

serca wrote:[img]upload%20failed[/img]

Here is one of those sculptures in Rappongi Hills Tokyo. It is massive! I never new what it was.

The Mori Tower in the background is an amazing building itself . Skydeck is not as good as Tokyo Skytree but still great views , with massive foyers
That's where I saw it as well. There's only one though (although there are some smaller sculptures in the series), and it's simply just moved. From the sounds of it, Qatar will be a permanent home from now on.
I find Roppongi Hills to be a tad over the top, although the Mori Art Museum is very good. If I'm in the area, I prefer Midtown with the 21_21 Design Sight gallery (not that I make a habit of hanging around Roppongi).

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

#105 Post by monotonehell » Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:13 pm

Nathan wrote:... Roppongi Hills to be a tad over the top, although the Mori Art Museum ...
Miles off topic. But, why do Roppongi Hills and the Mori Art Museum sound like they should be in New Zealand?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 81 guests