Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
slenderman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:44 am
#16
Post
by slenderman » Sat May 20, 2017 7:25 am
monotonehell wrote:
As per the instructions at the top of every development forum:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1881
Code: Select all
Abbreviations for Project Status
Note that these can be selected from the "Topic Prefix" menu when creating the thread.
VIS: VISion (not yet submitted to authority)
PRO: PROposed (submitted to authority, awaiting approval)
|
APP: APProved by authority
DEF: DEFerred by authority
REJ: REJected by authority
|
ONH: ON Hold
|
SWP: Site Works in Progress
- foundation work commenced; including the excavation of forms for foundations
- Note any site preparation, demolition of existing structures, clearing / leveling soil, ribbon cutting or sod turning ceremonies do not count as starting of site works in progress
|
U/R: Under Renovation
- where not a new build, old structure is undergoing external renovation
U/C: Under Construction
- actual building progress is being made
|
COM: COMpleted
- Tennant ready
Due to so many "ground breaking" ceremonies being little more than gold shovels tooling around in a pile of dirt; when they do the piling, stick in some rebar and pour the foundations we consider U/C.
Did someone jump the gun in the other thread?
I've read that navigation thread and double-consulted it before making that post. SWP means foundation works have commenced, but isn't piling a part of foundation works? That's where the confusion lies.
Unless piling counts as construction because the piles will stay there for the life of the building. I'm fine with that, as most buildings that get to that stage are built, I just find it a bit ambiguous.
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#17
Post
by monotonehell » Sun May 21, 2017 12:53 am
slenderman wrote:monotonehell wrote:
As per the instructions at the top of every development forum:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1881
Code: Select all
Abbreviations for Project Status
Note that these can be selected from the "Topic Prefix" menu when creating the thread.
VIS: VISion (not yet submitted to authority)
PRO: PROposed (submitted to authority, awaiting approval)
|
APP: APProved by authority
DEF: DEFerred by authority
REJ: REJected by authority
|
ONH: ON Hold
|
SWP: Site Works in Progress
- foundation work commenced; including the excavation of forms for foundations
- Note any site preparation, demolition of existing structures, clearing / leveling soil, ribbon cutting or sod turning ceremonies do not count as starting of site works in progress
|
U/R: Under Renovation
- where not a new build, old structure is undergoing external renovation
U/C: Under Construction
- actual building progress is being made
|
COM: COMpleted
- Tennant ready
Due to so many "ground breaking" ceremonies being little more than gold shovels tooling around in a pile of dirt; when they do the piling, stick in some rebar and pour the foundations we consider U/C.
Did someone jump the gun in the other thread?
I've read that navigation thread and double-consulted it before making that post. SWP means foundation works have commenced, but isn't piling a part of foundation works? That's where the confusion lies.
Unless piling counts as construction because the piles will stay there for the life of the building. I'm fine with that, as most buildings that get to that stage are built, I just find it a bit ambiguous.
I'd say piling counts as construction. Basically anything beyond excavation.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
#18
Post
by timtam20292 » Sun May 21, 2017 9:18 am
monotonehell wrote:slenderman wrote:monotonehell wrote:
As per the instructions at the top of every development forum:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1881
Code: Select all
Abbreviations for Project Status
Note that these can be selected from the "Topic Prefix" menu when creating the thread.
VIS: VISion (not yet submitted to authority)
PRO: PROposed (submitted to authority, awaiting approval)
|
APP: APProved by authority
DEF: DEFerred by authority
REJ: REJected by authority
|
ONH: ON Hold
|
SWP: Site Works in Progress
- foundation work commenced; including the excavation of forms for foundations
- Note any site preparation, demolition of existing structures, clearing / leveling soil, ribbon cutting or sod turning ceremonies do not count as starting of site works in progress
|
U/R: Under Renovation
- where not a new build, old structure is undergoing external renovation
U/C: Under Construction
- actual building progress is being made
|
COM: COMpleted
- Tennant ready
Due to so many "ground breaking" ceremonies being little more than gold shovels tooling around in a pile of dirt; when they do the piling, stick in some rebar and pour the foundations we consider U/C.
Did someone jump the gun in the other thread?
I've read that navigation thread and double-consulted it before making that post. SWP means foundation works have commenced, but isn't piling a part of foundation works? That's where the confusion lies.
Unless piling counts as construction because the piles will stay there for the life of the building. I'm fine with that, as most buildings that get to that stage are built, I just find it a bit ambiguous.
I'd say piling counts as construction. Basically anything beyond excavation.
I agree.
-
citywatcher
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm
#19
Post
by citywatcher » Sun May 21, 2017 1:16 pm
Another category to consider is for when demolition has taken place and the site is cleared and fenced off.
This will be AGSC - Awaiting Golden Shovel Ceremony.
Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
-
Ben
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 7480
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#20
Post
by Ben » Wed May 24, 2017 12:41 pm
Crane base installed and almost ready for ground floor pour.
![Image](http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee116/beamer85/BE860312-DDAC-4395-8C83-BFB47A2F4C0B.jpg)
-
Ben
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 7480
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#21
Post
by Ben » Sat May 27, 2017 1:09 pm
Crane up today.
![Image](http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee116/beamer85/AD2C04A2-4CDC-4F98-B136-A680E60A4EB7.jpg)
-
EBG
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm
#22
Post
by EBG » Thu Jun 08, 2017 11:27 pm
Work on the lift/service core is now progressing .Picture 8/6/17
-
Attachments
-
![20170608_synogoue pl 1.jpg](./download/file.php?id=4909&sid=ca337af7aea7b8c66b6d06026d4651c4)
- 20170608_synogoue pl 1.jpg (195.01 KiB) Viewed 4324 times
-
Ben
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 7480
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#23
Post
by Ben » Thu Jul 06, 2017 2:28 pm
Up to Level 3 already.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/fjzUQrB.jpg?3)
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#24
Post
by monotonehell » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:52 am
There was a mobile crane in operation on site this morning. The permanent crane was hovering overhead couldn't get at something?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
EBG
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm
#25
Post
by EBG » Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:29 pm
The mobile crane Monotonehell mentioned above, was lifting in some precast wall panels. Synagogue place was very congested. Note the Y shaped column holding up the building at the south west corner.
-
Attachments
-
![20170802_Synagogue 1.jpg](./download/file.php?id=5008&sid=ca337af7aea7b8c66b6d06026d4651c4)
- 20170802_Synagogue 1.jpg (185.98 KiB) Viewed 3329 times
-
![20170802_Synagogue 2.jpg](./download/file.php?id=5007&sid=ca337af7aea7b8c66b6d06026d4651c4)
- 20170802_Synagogue 2.jpg (167.11 KiB) Viewed 3329 times
-
![20170802_synogue 3.jpg](./download/file.php?id=5006&sid=ca337af7aea7b8c66b6d06026d4651c4)
- 20170802_synogue 3.jpg (187.46 KiB) Viewed 3329 times
-
Patrick_27
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
#26
Post
by Patrick_27 » Fri Aug 11, 2017 1:53 am
EBG wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:29 pm
The mobile crane Monotonehell mentioned above, was lifting in some precast wall panels. Synagogue place was very congested. Note the Y shaped column holding up the building at the south west corner.
Fancy Burger's already struggling shopfront is going be taking a beating from these works, here's hoping they can stick it out until this building goes up and is occupied.
On another point, does anyone know why these buildings aren't being painted and are just going to be raw concrete? Simply painting the building can give it a lot more appeal...
-
Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
-
Contact:
#27
Post
by Nathan » Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:10 am
Why is painting preferable to raw concrete? Raw, there’s texture and patina, and painting just removes that for solid colour which doesn’t hold up over time. My heart always sinks a little when I see someone painting concrete.
-
GrowAdelaide
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:35 am
#28
Post
by GrowAdelaide » Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:17 am
EBG wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:29 pm
The mobile crane Monotonehell mentioned above, was lifting in some precast wall panels. Synagogue place was very congested. Note the Y shaped column holding up the building at the south west corner.
Will be interesting to see how they engineer the extension of Tavistock Lane through to Synagogue Place
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#29
Post
by monotonehell » Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:31 am
Nathan wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:10 am
Why is painting preferable to raw concrete? Raw, there’s texture and patina, and painting just removes that for solid colour which doesn’t hold up over time. My heart always sinks a little when I see someone painting concrete.
Same. I always think to the future when the paint is faded and wearing. Are they intending to repaint all these buildings every few years?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
Mpol03
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am
#30
Post
by Mpol03 » Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:38 am
I wouldn't mind the raw concrete had the design been a little more interesting. It already looks dated by 40 years, based off of the render. I hope I'm wrong.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: abc, Dvious and 54 guests