News & Developments: Glenelg

Message

#16 Post by **Howie** » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:03 pm

Done wrote:It would be better if there wasn't as many old people on the beach

What do you consider old? And why wouldn't you want them there? Glenelg's a place for everyone to enjoy - not just kids with too much time on their hands.

Mants · #17 Post by **Mants** » Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:47 pm

Done wrote:the beach is horible at Gleneg there is seaweed everywhere we couldnt go in the water the council needs to fix that problem.

are you educated or do you just want to completely fuck up the ecosystem?

#18 Post by AG » Fri Sep 01, 2006 6:24 pm

I'd be more worried about the environmental effects than the social part. The development has made Glenelg into a great tourist spot, amongst both Adelaideans and those from interstate and overseas. But by looking around the development site, there will be some serious environmental issues within a few decades.

With rising sea levels, some parts of the site may flood during high tide, particularly the below ground carparks immediately behind the beach.

Also concerning is the uneven movement of sand due to longshore drift along this section of coast. The north side of the river at North Glenelg will lose all its sand if replenishment action does not keep up. It is pretty thin as we speak.

crawf · #19 Post by **crawf** » Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:01 pm

Done wrote:I never knew there were youg people in Adelaide

thats one of the most stupidest things, i have ever heard you say Done aka Las Vegas

Edgar · #20 Post by **Edgar** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:34 am

crawf wrote:
Done wrote:I never knew there were youg people in Adelaide
thats one of the most stupidest things, i have ever heard you say Las Vegas.

I can't stop laughing at that

mrblack · #21 Post by **mrblack** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:12 pm

check dis out fools
interesting vid of the beachouse and da new trams.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY_FgKsF ... ed&search=

#22 Post by **Howie** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:15 pm

Nice did you make that video?

mrblack · #23 Post by **mrblack** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:24 pm

negative, i just was looking around youtube and came across it.

shinji_123 · #24 Post by **shinji_123** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:12 pm

Yes = Positive impact
No = Negative impact

The recent Holdfast Shores development consist of the redevelopment of Moseley Square - also addition of new shops/cafes to Moseley square, the addition of the 'Beachhouse' which replaced Magic Mountain and the development of new apartments on the foreshore.

I'd like to see both sides to the arguement here. So if anyone has been affected in any way (Whether ur a local or tourist) in either a positive or negative way due to these developments please let us know.

Here are some previous posts on The developments.

Glenelg Entertainment Complex (New Magic Mountain)
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... .php?t=144

Moseley Square Redevelopment
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... c.php?t=81

Cheers

#25 Post by **AtD** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:02 pm

Are the developments going to have a positive or negative impact on locals and tourism in Glenelg?
Yes
No

JAKJ · #26 Post by **JAKJ** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:01 am

The developments have been good... but it could have been a lot better...

Holdfast shores, the Marina etc will all date very quickly, it is unfortunate that a higher standard of construction/design, better utilising the beach front wasn't employed.

#27 Post by **Will** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:45 pm

Those that criticise the development have an incorrect and nostalgic, fanciful view of what Glenelg used to be. However in fact they are wrong; before Holdfast Shores Glenelg was slow and many of the shops along Jetty Road were vacant. Where the marina is now there used to be a car-park which the nostalgics claim was a family fun park, but in reality it was a car-park where bogans would do burn-outs and drink beer. Holdfast Shores has had a massive positive impact for Glenelg. It has increased property values, it has added a new tourist assett to the state, it has also stimulated other improvements and modernisations across Glenelg. Although the development could have been better, for example the Colley Street facade of the Pier hotel is bland, Platinum should have been 15 stories and the shops fronting Jetty Road should have been 5 levels high and included a cinema, the development is still a positive move to Glenelg. One which future generations will acclaim as visionary.

crawf · #28 Post by **crawf** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:13 pm

I dont know if holdfast shores was a success or not. because every time ive been down there, its dead.

also the beachhouse is pretty pathetic, especially their website.

#29 Post by **AtD** » Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:29 pm

Because we all know the website is the most important part of a development.

#30 Post by **Will** » Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:20 pm

crawf wrote:I dont know if holdfast shores was a success or not. because every time ive been down there, its dead.

also the beachhouse is pretty pathetic, especially their website.

You are going at the wrong times...

News & Developments: Glenelg

Glenelg Development News and Progress Thread

Who is online