Moderators: Pikey, Pants, VIP Group

waz94 wrote:What would make a lot of sense in this development is too build a tram overpass over Marion road and have an elevated tram stop that is linked by a footbridge to the TOD. That tram crossing causes all sorts of problems due to its location between Anzac Hwy and Cross Road.
Just a thought.

AtD wrote:Georgey-boy, the tram stop is a about 400m away from the intersection. I read it as the car parks being inside the building, and since there's 20 shops plus five food places, I expect the majority of the spaces to be for the retailers.
It'd be extremely unrealistic to expect no car parks for 20 retail tenancies. The PT is reasonable in the area, but not that good.
Do I have the location of this building correct?
http://buildinglist.photoadelaide.com/M ... maploc=140
monotonehell wrote:This is not a TOD.
Note that it said "serviced apartments" -- that means hotel rooms.
So this is a hotel with shops and a big car park.
It's not walking like a TOD, nor quaking like a TOD, so it's not a TOD.
It's a nice development though.

Prince George wrote:Let's see, 100-ish apartments probably accounts for 150-ish parking spots, similar for the supermarket. That's about 300 spots, do the remaining tenancies really require 200+ parking spaces? I notice that the article refers to it as "one of the state’s first transport-oriented developments"; after all, cars are transport![]()

Norman wrote:Prince George wrote:I notice that the article refers to it as "one of the state’s first transport-oriented developments"; after all, cars are transport![]()
A TOD is actally a Transit Oriented Development

Brando wrote:monotonehell wrote:This is not a TOD.
Note that it said "serviced apartments" -- that means hotel rooms.
So this is a hotel with shops and a big car park.
It's not walking like a TOD, nor quaking like a TOD, so it's not a TOD.
It's a nice development though.
Maybe you and i are the only ones to pick up on that Mono. I was asking myself the same thing till i read your post. TOD is designed to encourage residential living with a strong emphasis on PT. I'm sure people living there full time with jobs in the CBD is what they are trying to promote.

Cruise wrote:Brando wrote:monotonehell wrote:This is not a TOD.
Note that it said "serviced apartments" -- that means hotel rooms.
So this is a hotel with shops and a big car park.
It's not walking like a TOD, nor quaking like a TOD, so it's not a TOD.
It's a nice development though.
Maybe you and i are the only ones to pick up on that Mono. I was asking myself the same thing till i read your post. TOD is designed to encourage residential living with a strong emphasis on PT. I'm sure people living there full time with jobs in the CBD is what they are trying to promote.
Yep thought the same thing. When are we going to start getting apartments that normal people can actually afford?
Omicron wrote:
I'll save some boxes from work and set up a multi-box apartment complex in the parklands. Location, location, location, isn't it?

skyliner wrote:Very nice looking development. High rise along Anzac is something I think will increase - especially there. A TOD site eh! Possibly interesting ramifications for the tramline.



Return to Metropolitan Development
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest