rev wrote:Why not do it over night?
That would take longer and cost more.
rev wrote:Why not do it over night?
Code: Select all
Signature removed
Actually, that isn't too bad of an idea... If only the location was just a little more central to the CBD.Heardy_101 wrote:Sad to see Keswick go.
The opportunity was there to make a Southern Cross station out of it, but that would have made too much sense.
The Government obviously didn't like the fact that there was a connection there at all (that little kefuffle dates back to the STA vs ANR days!)
I dont think one more cent should be spent on Keswick/Parklands terminal. It is a desolate lonely location, and not a good arrival to our city. Its a pity they could not find space for a terminal behind the new RAH, with the suburban lines sharing a station for the new hospital, then the metro trains continue on to terminate at Adelaide station.Heardy_101 wrote:Sad to see Keswick go.
The opportunity was there to make a Southern Cross station out of it, but that would have made too much sense.
The Government obviously didn't like the fact that there was a connection there at all (that little kefuffle dates back to the STA vs ANR days!)
That's an interesting idea!claybro wrote: Its a pity they could not find space for a terminal behind the new RAH, with the suburban lines sharing a station for the new hospital, then the metro trains continue on to terminate at Adelaide station.
This is quite possible, as it is the model used by various European cities where the international trains run through thier underground tracks once they enter he cities.Tonsley213 wrote:This is what I perdict Adelaide would be like in 50-100 years.
-our surban train services would be underground through the CBD and the track to be standardised.
This would mean that interstate trains which will be massively different would be able to go on the metro network, and to Adelaide Terminal
You have hit on the one area where our existing trains can compete with air travel. A couple of years ago I trevelled on a night service from Berlin to Munich a distance of about 600km. The "nachtzug" (nighttrain) service left Berlin at around 10pm and arrived in munich about 6am from memory The cost $EU 39.00 A slow journey by European standards, but the cabin was very quiet, the seats lay almost flat, and there was a decent bathroom on board to freshen up. Clean power for laptops service was avail on the train, and I actually had a decent sleep and saved on a. nights accomodation. Such services Adelaide to Melbourne, Melbourne to Sydney, Sydney to Brisbane I believe would be popular if the will existed to spend the money on decent rolling stock. Of coarse a CBD central station is also a must for this type of service.Heardy_101 wrote:The Overland does compete with Adelaide - Melbourne flights, but unless overnight services were restored then I would say it doesn't do even that at the time being. It's days are probably numbered more than anything.
No, they are not run poorly at all.Tonsley213 wrote:Do we have to go on and on about the interstate trains that are run so very poorly and provide absolutly not competition to aircraft.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 123 guests