[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Pistol
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3151 Post by Pistol » Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:23 pm

Bacon wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:00 am
Was reading about the Pym to Regency upgrade and found some interesting info -

https://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/ns ... pym_street says:
The concept design includes:

Left in and left out only access at Pym Street
whereas http://investment.infrastructure.gov.au ... 41-17SA-NP says:
The project also includes:

Grade separation of Pym Street under the motorway
(The Federal site says Project details last updated: 17/09/2018)
Under the motorway??
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2526
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3152 Post by SBD » Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:55 pm

Pistol wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:23 pm
Bacon wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:00 am
Was reading about the Pym to Regency upgrade and found some interesting info -

https://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/ns ... pym_street says:
The concept design includes:

Left in and left out only access at Pym Street
whereas http://investment.infrastructure.gov.au ... 41-17SA-NP says:
The project also includes:

Grade separation of Pym Street under the motorway
(The Federal site says Project details last updated: 17/09/2018)
Under the motorway??
The artists impression at the bottom of the state site shows the motorway and "surface roads" are all at grade through Pym Street (and shows only left-in/left-out). It might only require one or two more houses to be acquired to make space to put slip lanes to do left-in, left-out AND straight on underneath (without right turns). That avoids a narrow subway tunnel for cyclists and pedestrians, and a pedestrian/cycle-only bridge that needs maintenance and protection from rock droppers. Perhaps someone has identified it as a potentially cheaper option (or at least worthy of consideration by tenderers).

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 985
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3153 Post by Brucetiki » Wed Oct 17, 2018 2:38 pm

HiTouch wrote:
Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
I've noticed this week that traffic is considerably worse - 20+ minute bottleneck from the end of T2T to Henley Beach Rd.

Over time and once people work out what routes are best for them, I think it will sort itself out and the delays won't be as bad.

I was listening to a Sydney radio station this morning, and their traffic reports were reporting 8km and 10km delays on some of their roads - as crap as the bottlenecks are here it could be a hell of a lot worse.

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3154 Post by how good is he » Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:21 pm

Considering the cost of this project do you think the Govt should have acquired the Urbanstone property [and if needed a few others] to make it 3-lanes for the last 100-200m to the Brickworks?

Listy
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:07 pm

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3155 Post by Listy » Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:25 pm

Brucetiki wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 2:38 pm
HiTouch wrote:
Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
I've noticed this week that traffic is considerably worse - 20+ minute bottleneck from the end of T2T to Henley Beach Rd.
The jump in traffic probably has a lot to do with the school term starting this week.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2526
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3156 Post by SBD » Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:26 pm

Brucetiki wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 2:38 pm
HiTouch wrote:
Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
I've noticed this week that traffic is considerably worse - 20+ minute bottleneck from the end of T2T to Henley Beach Rd.

Over time and once people work out what routes are best for them, I think it will sort itself out and the delays won't be as bad.

I was listening to a Sydney radio station this morning, and their traffic reports were reporting 8km and 10km delays on some of their roads - as crap as the bottlenecks are here it could be a hell of a lot worse.
This week has been the first day back at school after a holiday, then drizzly at the time when people decide how they will go to work/school today. I suspect that there are a lot less walkers, cyclists and bus riders than usual. I don't know if daily statistics are available to check that theory. I live and work in outer suburbs and have noticed heavier traffic and fuller car parks this week, so it's not just the attraction of driving on the new motorway that is making heavier traffic.

Vasco
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:02 pm

[U/C] North-South Motorway

#3157 Post by Vasco » Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:35 pm

how good is he wrote:Considering the cost of this project do you think the Govt should have acquired the Urbanstone property [and if needed a few others] to make it 3-lanes for the last 100-200m to the Brickworks?
Regardless of any current bottlenecks, the non acquisition and non inclusion of Urbanstone land in the project, is for me the most perplexing and shortsighted part of the T2T project.

Anyone know any particular mention of this (besides land acquisition cost, which would have been relatively minimal in the grand scheme of the project)?

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2526
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3158 Post by SBD » Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:16 pm

Vasco wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:35 pm
how good is he wrote:Considering the cost of this project do you think the Govt should have acquired the Urbanstone property [and if needed a few others] to make it 3-lanes for the last 100-200m to the Brickworks?
Regardless of any current bottlenecks, the non acquisition and non inclusion of Urbanstone land in the project, is for me the most perplexing and shortsighted part of the T2T project.

Anyone know any particular mention of this (besides land acquisition cost, which would have been relatively minimal in the grand scheme of the project)?
"The plan" for crossing the Torrens has not been set yet, so that section would likely need to be reworked as part of the next phase. We got the Torrens Road bridge instead.

mawsonguy
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:11 am

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3159 Post by mawsonguy » Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:07 pm

Bacon wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:00 am
Was reading about the Pym to Regency upgrade and found some interesting info -

https://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/ns ... pym_street says:
The concept design includes:

Left in and left out only access at Pym Street
whereas http://investment.infrastructure.gov.au ... 41-17SA-NP says:
The project also includes:

Grade separation of Pym Street under the motorway
(The Federal site says Project details last updated: 17/09/2018)
Interestingly, the Federal site also says that the project includes "tie-ins to the Torrens Road to River Torrens Project lowered motorway at Lamont Street". That's about 200m past the point where the T2T starts but is about where the trench becomes fully lowered. Read into that what you will.

User avatar
baytram366
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
Contact:

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3160 Post by baytram366 » Fri Oct 19, 2018 3:12 pm

The Urbanstone site has always confused me too. I drove past a few weeks ago and it looks like they have also done some further renovations to the building too. You would think that they wouldn't be spending much $$$ on the building knowing its ultimate fate but I guess that could be years off yet.
Baytram 366's Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34520752@N07/collections

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3161 Post by how good is he » Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:49 pm

I’ve heard rumours in the past that as the site is so big & prominent and supposedly the owner/s live overseas and they wanted/had it valued at $10m + ? I also remember one year it was used before the state election, not sure if it was Labour or Liberal or the purpose?

Furyan
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 09, 2018 2:18 pm

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3162 Post by Furyan » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:47 am

Pictures of Darlington Project yesterday

Looking south Flinders Drive Bridge
The attachment 20181019 1.jpg is no longer available
Attachments
20181019 1.jpg
20181019 1.jpg (288.15 KiB) Viewed 3128 times

Furyan
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 09, 2018 2:18 pm

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3163 Post by Furyan » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:56 am

Looking north from Flinders Drive Bridge
20181019 2.jpg
20181019 2.jpg (330.87 KiB) Viewed 3124 times

Furyan
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 09, 2018 2:18 pm

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3164 Post by Furyan » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:58 am

Flinders Drive intersection
20181019 3.jpg
20181019 3.jpg (254.4 KiB) Viewed 3124 times

Furyan
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 09, 2018 2:18 pm

[U/C] Re: North-South Motorway

#3165 Post by Furyan » Sat Oct 20, 2018 12:03 pm

Darlington Project Newsletter October 2018

https://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__ ... letter.pdf

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abc, Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 130 guests