News & Discussion: Trams

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
rubberman
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2461 Post by rubberman » Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:11 pm

I would have called 11th March "Ambitious". However, let's see. I can't see them having North Terrace and Riverside all finished.

Maybe that date is when the trams start running for testing etc?

I truly do not know.

User avatar
Haso
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:07 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2462 Post by Haso » Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:38 pm

rubberman wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:11 pm
I would have called 11th March "Ambitious". However, let's see. I can't see them having North Terrace and Riverside all finished.

Maybe that date is when the trams start running for testing etc?

I truly do not know.
I would not call 11 March “ambitious”… but as you said… will see.

Meanwhile, the price of each 28 Day Pass is being reduced from 3 April and regular will cost $99… now is $124.50… concession will drop from $71.60 to $49 and students will have to pay $25 and that is $16.50 less + we will have some new options…
https://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/Announ ... metroCARDs

Medo

P.S. If this news is posted somewhere else… my apologies… I found this today and decide to share…
Image The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong.

muzzamo
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1026
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2463 Post by muzzamo » Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:32 am

Haso wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:38 pm


I would not call 11 March “ambitious”… but as you said… will see.

Meanwhile, the price of each 28 Day Pass is being reduced from 3 April and regular will cost $99… now is $124.50… concession will drop from $71.60 to $49 and students will have to pay $25 and that is $16.50 less + we will have some new options…
https://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/Announ ... metroCARDs

Medo

P.S. If this news is posted somewhere else… my apologies… I found this today and decide to share…
I have been using the 28 day pass since it came out, but had recently been considering ditching it. As a 9-5, 5 day a week commuter the savings that you got from it could be quite quickly wiped out by a couple of sick days/leave days/public holidays/lifts with someone/cycling in/etc. Commute by public transport a few days less than 20 of the 28 days and the benefits are gone.

At $99, its a much sharper proposition.

User avatar
omada
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Eden Hills

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2464 Post by omada » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:51 am

I think its disappointing that the fare reduction applies only to the 28 day passes.

I don't think it solves the lack of PT uptake in Adelaide (worst of Australian capital cities), the fare reductions should apply more broadly, to encourage new users to PT.

Also leads to another point, why isn't there more promotion of PT routes, benefits etc - they need to SELL it, like any other product.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6392
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2465 Post by Norman » Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:26 pm

The point of the reduction is to encourage ongoing use of the public transport system. For those who don't need it for the full 28 days, there is also a 14 day pass now, and new users are encouraged by the removal of the card purchase fee, which was previously $5.

User avatar
Haso
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:07 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2466 Post by Haso » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:24 pm

I think it is move in the right direction. Since I arrived here I have noticed improvements in frequency and route options, but not that much in corresponding numbers of passengers, at least in the directions and routes I am using. Hope this will help others to change their habits. There are days I share my daily ride with one or two passengers… even when I go to the city in peak hours I can anticipate a seat for myself, or someone will vacant their seat for me as I am getting older, believe it or not that still happens occasionally. Occasionally I venture into other areas of the city, and yes, I have a car and as a bonus, I have a motorbike but I prefer using public transport during a week.
Some objections to using public transport are fairly pathetic… including not having enough private space, dependence on time-tables and so on… I know that now and then I/we will share “the public space” with some peculiar characters… but that’s life. Personally I am finding these characters pretty amusing and sometimes interesting in my daily commuting routine… but that’s me, otherwise I will read whatever I have stored on my Kindle.
Image The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong.

rubberman
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2467 Post by rubberman » Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:54 am

For all those who think DPTI has not been managing the project well, here's a report on Sydney:

https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/ ... d-schedule

Cost blowouts (from a base cost that was only 50% higher than the Nth Tce job to double what we are paying per km).
Time blowout.
George Street shut down for near to a year, compared to the access this Adelaide project has managed for almost the entire time.

The 9 News report is a bit confusing in that it talks of 28km of track. They are talking of single track. That is, the route itself is about 14km (actually it's about 13km of route, so they might be including depot track as well).

Bottom line for me is that if the Sydney mob were doing North Terrace, we'd be looking at a June opening date (which they wouldn't be meeting), $160m, and North Terrace being completely closed all that time.

Edit. I forgot to add that the rail profile adopted for the George Street tramway is slightly different from the rail profile for the other tramway it crosses, which heads out past Darling Harbour. That means they can't switch trams easily from one system to the other if the need arises, since the wheel profiles are different. My information is that they can travel slowly on the other system if needing to, but not at service speed. How smart is that?

I'd say Adelaide is doing pretty well.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7479
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2468 Post by Ben » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:59 am

The wires sure are ugly. I'm hoping some of these are temporary.

Image

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2469 Post by timtam20292 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:07 am

Don’t think I’ve seen anything like that ever on the wires in Melbourne.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2470 Post by [Shuz] » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:44 am

Looks normal for tram wires to me. Dunno what you lot are complaining about.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2068
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2471 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:54 am

Ben wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:59 am
The wires sure are ugly. I'm hoping some of these are temporary.
To be fair that's over the KWS/NT intersection where there are essentially 7 lines requiring power. The rest of the extension is far less wire-heavy.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2472 Post by SBD » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:41 pm

timtam20292 wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:07 am
Don’t think I’ve seen anything like that ever on the wires in Melbourne.
I think being silhouetted against the sky in a fairly close photo makes them stand out more. Streetview doesn't provide many comparable photos that I have found in Melbourne. Looking down Latrobe Street across the Swanston Street junction shows a bit, or Latrobe and William Streets. But many of the inner intersections have tram tracks crossing at right angles, with no turns at all.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2068
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2473 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:48 pm

timtam20292 wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:07 am
Don’t think I’ve seen anything like that ever on the wires in Melbourne.
Here's the Balaclava grand union in Melbourne. Our poles are nicer ;)

Image
Last edited by Llessur2002 on Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kasey771
Legendary Member!
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2474 Post by Kasey771 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:50 pm

So not much of a difference there to my untrained eye.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.

rubberman
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#2475 Post by rubberman » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:55 pm

Kasey771 wrote:
Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:50 pm
So not much of a difference there to my untrained eye.
Yes. The Adelaide one will become a trifle less obvious once the wire loses its bright copper sheen, and not having the extra curve to North Terrace also helps.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests