if you read this in particular pg 26 it tells you why they have picked option 2 more than likely
http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__d ... erplan.pdf
Matt wrote:Can someone enlighten me as to the change between the initial render of the southern stand and the new one?
The first had something covering the tiered/stepped back of the grandstand and on the new one this is gone.
Was it glass? Canvas?

SouthAussie94 wrote:I always thought the arches at the back of the Bradman Stand were heritage listed. Obviously not...
Aidan wrote:Is there still the problem of prostitutes on Churchill Road causing traffic congestion?

dsriggs wrote:SouthAussie94 wrote:I always thought the arches at the back of the Bradman Stand were heritage listed. Obviously not...
The arches were built with the rest of the stand to try & match the arches of the Western Stands, so they were only there for 20 years.
SouthAussie94 wrote:I always thought the arches at the back of the Bradman Stand were heritage listed. Obviously not...
Thanks for the photos Demo. I loved your work with the Harris Scarfe demoliton. Keep it up!!
Waewick wrote:dsriggs wrote:SouthAussie94 wrote:I always thought the arches at the back of the Bradman Stand were heritage listed. Obviously not...
The arches were built with the rest of the stand to try & match the arches of the Western Stands, so they were only there for 20 years.
which arches are you talking about?
AdelaideAlive wrote:bradman stand all gone as of today, chappell stands as well only thing remaining is that small stand on the hill now ,forgot the name of it.
mutt wrote:AdelaideAlive wrote:bradman stand all gone as of today, chappell stands as well only thing remaining is that small stand on the hill now ,forgot the name of it.
i think its called Trevor
Users browsing this forum: Adeguy72, AG, Google [Bot], Ian, ml69 and 7 guests