APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 66m | 16lvls | Office

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~50m 13 Lvls Of

Postby Omicron » Wed May 18, 2011 12:49 am

Bless you for reminding me of this development, but points away for the very same reason. City Central above North Terrace is not at all appealing, but the use/renovation/improvement of this delightful old building brings many a smile to my face. So, um, I think that means that I'm conflicted.
User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
 
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~50m 13 Lvls Of

Postby adam73837 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:14 pm

I can't see the basement floor plan very well, so forgive me if this sounds a little stupid, but would they consider putting something like The London Tavern here?
I take back many of the things I said before 2010; particularly my anti-Rann rants. While I still maintain some of said opinions, I feel I could have been less arrogant. I also apologise to people I offended; while knowing I can't fully take much back. :)
User avatar
adam73837
High Rise Poster!
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: The wilderness being sustained by nutrients in the air and powering my laptop with positive energy

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~50m 13 Lvls Of

Postby baytram366 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 11:40 am

Anything further on this project?
User avatar
baytram366
High Rise Poster!
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~50m 13 Lvls Of

Postby Ben » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:54 pm

This has since been redesigned and a surprise increase in height. The ACC last night approved this building to exceed normal encroachment rules regarding footpaths etc.

The building is now 16 levels and 101 above sea level. I think this area is about 35m above sea level? Making this about 65m?

New renders:

Image

Image

Image
Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Posts: 3850
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m 16 Lvls Of

Postby phenom » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:27 pm

It's always a pleasant surprise when height is added, particularly when it suits. It's commendable that the ACC saw fit to let it through too... perhaps the recent spate of tanties is over for now. I'm quite liking the wedge effect and the blending of the old with new although these renders make it a tad hard to know what colour glass that is supposed to be. Views would be rather nice from this one.
phenom
High Rise Poster!
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 1:12 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby Nathan » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:16 pm

That's actually rather nice, definitely more interesting than the original proposal. Bring it on!
User avatar
Nathan
Legendary Member!
 
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:09 pm
Location: Stepney

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby metro » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:21 pm

nice, something new and glassy on a visible part of the skyline. Hope it turns out good.

also I hope that section of the Gawler Pl footpath gets widened, is really far too narrow for one of the main streets between Rundle Mall and North Tce.. But there are 4 lanes for cars + parking :roll:

http://g.co/maps/kc5m9

at least it isnt as bad as the footpaths on Field Street (the street that continues south from Chinatown/Moonta Street), i think these are less than 1m wide, but plenty of car space: http://g.co/maps/7ahj2
User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
 
Posts: 620
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby Will » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:45 pm

I love the contrast between the orange brick of Gawler Chambers and the blue glass of the tower extension.

However, 'contrast' is a dirty word according to the current development plan...

Not to mention, there have been plans since the 80s to redevelop the site. I hope the ACC sees the light and realises that this development, whilst being modern and not preserving the entire facade of Gawler Chambers is a better outcome than such an iconic building in such a prominent location remaining abandoned for another 30 years.
Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Posts: 4784
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby Will » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:51 pm

metro wrote:at least it isnt as bad as the footpaths on Field Street (the street that continues south from Chinatown/Moonta Street), i think these are less than 1m wide, but plenty of car space: http://g.co/maps/7ahj2


Amen to that!

As a frequent diner at Wasai, I always wonder why the footpath is so narrow and such an insignificant street so wide. Field Street has so much potential to become an attractive and vibrant extension of Gouger Street, but that is being held back by the lack of pedestrtian amenity.
Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Posts: 4784
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby crawf » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:52 pm

This building looks like a smaller version of a building on Sim City 3000 :lol:

Will wrote:I love the contrast between the orange brick of Gawler Chambers and the blue glass of the tower extension.

However, 'contrast' is a dirty word according to the current development plan...

Not to mention, there have been plans since the 80s to redevelop the site. I hope the ACC sees the light and realises that this development, whilst being modern and not preserving the entire facade of Gawler Chambers is a better outcome than such an iconic building in such a prominent location remaining abandoned for another 30 years.


Remember the DAC have the final say...
crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
 
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby Thanial » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:55 pm

I actually liked the initial design, and though I'm ecstatic about the height increase :D I'm yet to be won over by the design. I like the idea of the wedge, but for some reason I think that the central building looks like something out of the eighties :? Hopefully new renders will make it look a lot better (for me, since everyone else seems to like it! :lol: )
User avatar
Thanial
Gold-Member ;)
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:54 pm
Location: Mitcham

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby Wayno » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:58 pm

Hopefully there's plans for a rooftop restaurant/bar/cafe on the heritage building. There seems to be space available, and it would certainly offer nice views...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Posts: 4422
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby monotonehell » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:07 pm

Will wrote:...I always wonder why the footpath is so narrow and such an insignificant street so wide...

Possibly because of the taxi rank & turn around, the rear access for semi-trailers to the supermarket, and the carpark spews a tonne of cars in a very short period at the end of shopping days.

On the building render - I don't hate it. It's like a collision of three buildings. (Almost) anything to stop Gawler Chambers rotting.
Brazer wrote:Yet another box our city is looking like a giant legoland :wallbash:

Brazer wrote:What could we possibly establish here...that is unique and would actually be a draw card for locals and visitors alike. I was thinking of something like a Legoland down under.
User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:10 pm
Location: Adelaide, East End.

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby Omicron » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:04 pm

Well now, that's a nice little surprise! As Mono rightly points out, it's nothing earth-shattering, but better than the alternative of Gawler Chambers turning into a pile of old socks.
User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
 
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: PRO: 186-190 North Tce (Gawler Chambers) ~65m | 16 Lvls

Postby rev » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:26 pm

Average.
If it was something more then two boxes intersected, it would be much better.
Previous design was more elegant.
rev
Legendary Member!
 
Posts: 1096
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:14 am

PreviousNext

Return to CBD Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: SouthAussie94 and 1 guest