



jk1237 wrote:ok this doesn't look as bad in person, however I must admit I do have a fetish for commie block stuff. I may be alone in saying this, but looking down Bank St from Hindley Street, the urban-nest student towers look so cool imo, I love them. This uno will have more glass on the upper levels too which as shown above hasn't started. So I will wait for the finished product






crawf wrote:This looks so god damn ugly from the west. And to make things worse, this building combined with the blank walls of CC8 and Waymouth Exchange give the impression of one massive continuous ugly blank wall. It really is an eyesore.

Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

wilkiebarkid wrote:Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."
How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.
If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.

wilkiebarkid wrote:Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."
How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.
If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.

jk1237 wrote: slumness
wilkiebarkid wrote:Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."
How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.
If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.
The development proposal could include affordable housing for the vulnerable and low-income workers or a 190-apartment complex.
jk1237 wrote:wilkiebarkid wrote:Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."
How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.
If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.
thats quite silly to say. The apartments above the bus station are for low income and some former homeless and I dont see that area full of crime and stabbings and slumness. Infact its better than it used to be. Will be far from a slum

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests