[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:33 pm
Oh, right, gotcha.
Must be political season, hey? Fudging the numbers.
Must be political season, hey? Fudging the numbers.
Sensational-Adelaide.com
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
https://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3253
Page 6 of 8
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:55 pm
Drove past this one on Sunday morning, fire brigade at the front and smoke coming out of the boarded up windows towards the top. Surprised it didn't make the news?
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:12 am
Second Sunday morning in a row, fire brigade and smoke! Is this what they call a controlled burn? Lol (Smoke had cleared by time I found a park)
- ImageUploadedByTapatalk1376181750.777698.jpg (89.39 KiB) Viewed 5959 times
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:41 am
Ive always wondered how many squatters would camp overnight in this building. Quite a few I guess
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:38 am
I see the fire brigade so frequently out the front there I assumed they were using it for training. Squatter mishaps is the more likely scenario, though.
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:06 pm
I was walking along North Terrace this morning when the fire brigade was there. It was just a training exercise, they had a small sign saying so placed on the footpath..
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:33 pm
Well, there you have it. Training after all.
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 3:58 pm
Not sure if the office tower has been scrapped?
Type: Application Assessed on Merit
Application Number: DA/981/2014
Lodgement Date: 12/12/2014
Location: GAWLER CHAMBERS, 186-190 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000
Description: Repairs and maintenance to facade.
Applicant Name: ADELAIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS P/L
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 1:31 pm
According to Indaily. Maintenece work is about to start on the facade. The redevelopment has been put on hold due to lack of interest in office accomodation at this point in time.
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:48 pm
i've said it before, still one of my favorite buildings and happy to see this one come up for repairs.
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:00 pm
The developers have asked for another extension - the 8th I believe 10 years after the initial approval.
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:04 pm
Are Adelaide Development Company the ones who sat on the old Planet site for 15 years too? Disgraceful, wish someone serious would buy this site and actually do something with it - even if it was just restoring the original building at this point.Ben wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:00 pmThe developers have asked for another extension - the 8th I believe 10 years after the initial approval.
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:07 pm
Yep sure is. Notorious for this sort of thing.
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:24 pm
It should be refused, though we shouldn't assume that means they'll offload the property. It will likely languish longer.
I'd like the government to proactively relieve the developer of the building and restore it, potentially as new headquarters/museum for History Trust SA (which is presently homeless).
I'd like the government to proactively relieve the developer of the building and restore it, potentially as new headquarters/museum for History Trust SA (which is presently homeless).
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:50 pm
This kind of thing really irks me - either build it, or don't.Ben wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:00 pmThe developers have asked for another extension - the 8th I believe 10 years after the initial approval.
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf