News & Discussion: Trams

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
ralmin
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:38 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4321 Post by ralmin » Thu Aug 15, 2019 11:47 am

Is is true that any station at which the tram-train needed to stop would have needed to be modified to have a platform at a lower height to suit boarding the tram-train?

PD2/20
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4322 Post by PD2/20 » Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:16 pm

claybro wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 10:32 am
PD2/20 wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 10:04 am
I would suggest two factors in the abandonment. One of the drivers for the tram/train was to service Football Park at West Lakes. This was removed by the Adelaide Oval redevelopment initiated in 2010. The second factor was the need for gauge conversion. As this would have involved the entire AdMet network including the depot and stabling facilities and conversion of all rolling stock, it would have entailed extended system closures and logistical compexity.
Yes I understood gauge was part of the issue, but that is also covered in Eurooe by dual gauge tracks. Even without AAMI stadium now, the Wrst Lakes area is becoming quite high density and should be served by rail. Surely the combination of heavy rail serving the longer OH line and light rail using the same corridors but multiple branches was the ideal outcome for the North West. I don't get why it is so hard, when the technology already exists, as does the corridor.
How many of the European tram/train systems are in fact dual guage? Dual gauge track can be challenging with regard to platform clearances and pointwork construction. The comparitively small difference between stand and broad gauge also imposes limitations on the type and weight of rail and fasteners used.

PD2/20
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4323 Post by PD2/20 » Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:20 pm

ralmin wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 11:47 am
Is is true that any station at which the tram-train needed to stop would have needed to be modified to have a platform at a lower height to suit boarding the tram-train?
Generally yes.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1977
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 213 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4324 Post by claybro » Thu Aug 15, 2019 1:42 pm

All of the "issues" we seem to find insurmountable are all covered in numerous examples elsewhere. You want a tram running in an underground metro?.. yep. It's just a tram in a tunnel. You want it to share a road?.. that's what they do. You want a tram to share a heavy rail track?..done.. multiple power sources ?.. yep. Hilly terrain?... check. Coupleing for more capacity.?..no probs.hell you want it to carry freight ?..yep. All running efficiently, suiting the exact need of a given area/demographic/ topography/cost. Meanwhile in Oz.. maybe with the exception of Melbourne, we find the most expensive, least efficient, average solution to any given need...then give up and decide buses are easier. Noisy polluting traffic clogging limited capacity buses. When our "experts" are dragged kicking and screaming to lay 500m of extra track.. it takes forever, costs even more.. and is then closed down for repairs and alterations.

User avatar
1NEEDS2POST
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4325 Post by 1NEEDS2POST » Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:39 pm

One of the great things about the Outer Harbor route, in particular, is that it's straight from Nairne Junction to Port Adelaide. This means the wheel profile is not a concern, you could run trams or trains of any type. Dual gauge is difficult because of the closeness of broad and standard gauge, but bear in mind the inner rail only needs to support trams, so it could be thinner than the other rails.

Gauge conversion is not as difficult as it's made out to be. The rolling stock is easy to gauge convert. It only took two weeks to convert the Adelaide-Melbourne railway. Adelaide Metro has one fifth the track, plus the sleepers are ready to go. I reckon the Adelaide Metro network could be converted in a weekend.

Spotto
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4326 Post by Spotto » Fri Aug 16, 2019 8:01 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:39 pm
Gauge conversion is not as difficult as it's made out to be. The rolling stock is easy to gauge convert. It only took two weeks to convert the Adelaide-Melbourne railway. Adelaide Metro has one fifth the track, plus the sleepers are ready to go. I reckon the Adelaide Metro network could be converted in a weekend.
C'mon, this is Adelaide we're talking about... :lol:

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 915
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#4327 Post by Goodsy » Sat Aug 17, 2019 4:25 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:39 pm
Gauge conversion is not as difficult as it's made out to be. The rolling stock is easy to gauge convert. It only took two weeks to convert the Adelaide-Melbourne railway. Adelaide Metro has one fifth the track, plus the sleepers are ready to go. I reckon the Adelaide Metro network could be converted in a weekend.
After the American Civil War the entire American South brought their gauge into line with the rest of the USA.

They converted 11,500 miles of track in 36 hours

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests