[U/C] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2529
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#286 Post by SBD » Mon Mar 18, 2024 10:34 am

Spotto wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2024 10:12 am
SBD wrote:
Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:26 pm
The 2015 ten-year-plan identified the middle bit as the highest priority, but we've got the other bits first as money became available.
I’d go a step further and add that the smaller bits of the NSM also functioned as proof of concept/commitment to the eventual full upgrade.
Northern Expressway didn't really prove anything new (but was before that plan I think). Southern Expressway proved not to do one carriageway before the other? Superway was a good proof of concept and it works, but the other section that was meant to be like it will now be a bored tunnel instead. Northern Connector doesn't prove anything except that drivers will choose the perceived best route, and move traffic problems to different feeders (increased traffic on Curtis and other Roads because the Connector is now "better" than Main North Road). T2T proves that traffic lights too close to the off ramp can lead to queuing on the motorway (Port Road from the north), but the revised Malinauskas plan does exactly the same thing at Anzac Highway northbound instead of the Marshall plan that had a flyover like Ayliffes Road. I'm not sure what the original Weatherill plan was.

Building the middle bit first would also have lead to the end bits being needed as they would all feed in to the best way across inner Adelaide.

Eurostar
Legendary Member!
Posts: 930
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#287 Post by Eurostar » Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:01 am

It was foolish and short sighted of Government to think they can build the Northern Expressway and not widen main roads feeding to and from it.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2075
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#288 Post by AG » Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:44 pm

Eurostar wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:01 am
It was foolish and short sighted of Government to think they can build the Northern Expressway and not widen main roads feeding to and from it.
Agree with this. Combined with the increased residential developments occurring closer to the Northern Expressway, Womma and Curtis Roads are going to need significant investment to keep up with the increased traffic flows linking the Northern Expressway to Main North Road.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2529
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#289 Post by SBD » Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:45 pm

AG wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:44 pm
Eurostar wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:01 am
It was foolish and short sighted of Government to think they can build the Northern Expressway and not widen main roads feeding to and from it.
Agree with this. Combined with the increased residential developments occurring closer to the Northern Expressway, Womma and Curtis Roads are going to need significant investment to keep up with the increased traffic flows linking the Northern Expressway to Main North Road.
I think the early plans did not have south side ramps at Curtis Road. I think it is still the only Council-owned not state-owned connection to the North South Motorway/M2. I'm not sure if the City of Playford were consulted, and how much, but it looks like Renewal SA deciding to make a nice "Main Street" for Playford Alive did not talk to Transport and Infrastructure. Renewal SA has continued to exacerbate the problem by upgrading feeder roads into Curtis Road, but dragging its feet on developing parallel streets for local traffic to not need to use Curtis Road.

User avatar
MT269
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 1:14 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#290 Post by MT269 » Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:30 pm

Curtis Rd is a car park in peak periods. It seriously needs at least two or three lanes. It's not going to fix itself.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2529
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#291 Post by SBD » Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:38 pm

MT269 wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:30 pm
Curtis Rd is a car park in peak periods. It seriously needs at least two or three lanes. It's not going to fix itself.
Opening Newton Boulevard to Stebonheath Road would move some of the school traffic off of the "main street" section. That seems like a quick win doing something that will be done eventually anyway.

We are well off track from Ovingham...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: eKwatee and 2 guests