Search found 990 matches

by Pants
Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:46 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Rundle Place | 76m | 15lvls | Retail & Office
Replies: 1842
Views: 412336

[COM] Re: U/C: Rundle Place | 76m | 15lvls | Retail & Office

Without having seen anything to suggest it would, I had a feeling that would happen. Just didn't see them leaving that big blank facade facing the mall, even though I don't think it turned out as bad as many (including me) had feared.
by Pants
Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:33 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: News & Discussion: CBD Retail
Replies: 3930
Views: 1107608

Re: News & Discussion: CBD Retail

There's a Funk next door funnily enough.
by Pants
Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:54 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Rundle Place | 76m | 15lvls | Retail & Office
Replies: 1842
Views: 412336

[COM] Re: U/C: Rundle Place | 76m | 15lvls | Retail & Office

Waewick wrote:
Pants wrote:What was it?*



*allegedly
Rental not being paid was a big part from what I can gather.

it appears the local franchise wasn't well run.
Thanks mate. You'd think that poor turnover was the main reason for their failure to pay rent though.
by Pants
Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:43 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Rundle Place | 76m | 15lvls | Retail & Office
Replies: 1842
Views: 412336

[COM] Re: U/C: Rundle Place | 76m | 15lvls | Retail & Office

What was it?*



*allegedly
by Pants
Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:48 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)
Replies: 1052
Views: 339473

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

Have finally had the chance to see those that didn't make it and there are some really interesting and striking concepts there. Have to say though that I haven't had the time to read the brief so can't say much about the extent to which they meet it. It does appear though that at this stage, the jud...
by Pants
Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:24 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
Replies: 4475
Views: 1030026

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

The turf laying was supposed to start at the end of last month, so i guess it'll have to go on this month at the latest. No way they'll have the Eastern Stand roof frames finished by then. They'll have to find another way of doing it. It's going to be crazy tight to meet the November and March deadl...
by Pants
Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:17 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)
Replies: 1052
Views: 339473

[SWP] Re: #PRO: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)

Can someone please post some renders from the other submissions? I'm not having any luck getting onto the website on a phone/iPad.
by Pants
Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:43 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [CAN] New Courts Precinct | $500m
Replies: 92
Views: 51163

[CAN] Re: PRO: New Courts Precinct | $500m

Yeah, the first one was an unsolicited proposal by JPE. The next 3 are government sourced concepts specifically for the proposal being called for. It's unlikely that any of them will resemble the final design as it'll be a private design and construct project, but they're the best ones to go on for ...
by Pants
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:07 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
Replies: 4475
Views: 1030026

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

It's still a cricket ground too, you see. Plenty of time to take in the view over a 5 day test match.
by Pants
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:32 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
Replies: 4475
Views: 1030026

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

It's not intended to be a true stadium and doesn't need to be. Give me this over the Gabba, Docklands and even the MCG, any day.
by Pants
Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:37 am
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
Replies: 4475
Views: 1030026

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Except the ones directly behind the players' dugout.
by Pants
Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:22 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
Replies: 4475
Views: 1030026

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Of course, didn't even think of that. I think Perth has been announced, without the reason being made clear, so it is definitely down to Adelaide v Brisbane with the main issues being better attendances/redeveloped and bigger ground in Adelaide vs. the effect of Brisbane missing a test match on the ...