[APP] 29 Twin Street | 124m | 38lvls | Student accom
- Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
They should just build all student accommodation on one city block away from prime locations. Like PeFe said if these buildings can't be converted to proper apartments at a later stage should things change, they will be an ugly sight! Hopefully Hines is much smarter than the others. My
Cheers
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
The worry is that this tower, although 36 levels in heights is less than $10m in cost and going to the council rather than the DAC. Does not suggest an ornate design.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
- timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
The council doesnt get to have a say about building proposals anymore. So I'm not too sure what you are talking about.bigman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:03 pmThe worry is that this tower, although 36 levels in heights is less than $10m in cost and going to the council rather than the DAC. Does not suggest an ornate design.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
Last edited by timtam20292 on Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
I wouldn't worry about that, I believe that $10m piece on the DA indicates it falls above the threshold and will be reviewed by the DAC. There is absolutely no way a 36 level tower can be built for less than $10m.bigman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:03 pmThe worry is that this tower, although 36 levels in heights is less than $10m in cost and going to the council rather than the DAC. Does not suggest an ornate design.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
Yes the application is asssed by DAC as it exceeds $10m. I don’t think even in China could they build a 36 level building for that price.
- baytram366
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
- Contact:
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
Not sure if I've missed something here but google maps shows 29 Twin St as the Gays Arcade building. Is this proposal to demolish Gays Arcade or build it on the carpark site directly behind the Ibis?
Baytram 366's Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34520752@N07/collections
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
baytram366 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:38 amNot sure if I've missed something here but google maps shows 29 Twin St as the Gays Arcade building. Is this proposal to demolish Gays Arcade or build it on the carpark site directly behind the Ibis?
It’s for the land behind Ibis and is the main reason the Jade Monkey was demolished rather than just for access to build Ibis.
- wilkiebarkid
- Donating Member
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Adelaide
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
It's very narrow!Pants wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:16 pmbaytram366 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:38 amNot sure if I've missed something here but google maps shows 29 Twin St as the Gays Arcade building. Is this proposal to demolish Gays Arcade or build it on the carpark site directly behind the Ibis?
It’s for the land behind Ibis and is the main reason the Jade Monkey was demolished rather than just for access to build Ibis.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
With heritage listed properties on the north and west bounderies, street facing on the east and a new tower to it's south there should be no excuse for blank walls on this. I just hope it doesn't take design cues from the nearby Dwell development.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
New tower on a joining block wouldn't change anything would it? A building should take into account how neighbouring blocks could be used in decades to come.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
ACC has this as 38 levels.
Application Number: S10/43/2018
Type: Schedule 10
Lodged: 09/08/2018
Latest Decision
Location: 27-29 Twin Street, ADELAIDE SA 5000
Description: Construct a 38 Storey student accommodation building accommodating a total of 510 students on vacant land.
Status: Being Assessed
- shiftaling
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Modbury
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
I guess we can't expect it to be beautiful but the location probably means that it won't be a blight on the skyline.
[APP] Re: 29 Twin Street | ~122m | 36lvls | Student accom
How can you make that assertion already?shiftaling wrote: ↑Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:51 pmI guess we can't expect it to be beautiful but the location probably means that it won't be a blight on the skyline.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 69 guests