Well...This is embarrassing...monotonehell wrote:Yes but it's the one RIGHT BEFORE YOU POST!Patrick_27 wrote:I try, but it gets so tedious at points.Ben wrote:You should read prior posts

Well...This is embarrassing...monotonehell wrote:Yes but it's the one RIGHT BEFORE YOU POST!Patrick_27 wrote:I try, but it gets so tedious at points.Ben wrote:You should read prior posts
North Terrace Mixed Use Development
+Client:Commercial & General, Maras Group and Le Cordon Bleau+
Location:Adelaide CBD, SA+
Features:Commercial office space, High End Retail, Education Facility and Apartments
The vision is to create mixed use high end destination within the city centre which includes high end retail on the ground level, education, office and residential, plus associated car parking.
The 20 level mixed use development will be Adelaide’s first premium grade building in over a decade. A total floor space of 32,000sqm, the ten upper levels will be comprise of 20,000 sqm of office space whilst the remaining first three levels will be dedicated to retail.
International hospitality education institution Le Cordon Bleu will anchor the building and is set to tenant four levels making this the largest education facility in the world
I'm a massive advocate of a new CBD cinema complex; but this site, unless directly off the mall (and not Gawler Place) - it won't work. The city doesn't desperately need a 'mainstream' cinema - cinema popularity has been on the decline; Palace Nova are probably in the best position, Art House cinema has never been stronger, and their ability to mix that with a selection of popular films at the East End has worked well. Though, I'm with you on another city cinema centrally located; I would love to see Wallis capitalize on this, as a former employee of their Chelsea Cinema it was under serious consideration at the closure of Glenelg and vacating of Chelsea, since then there has been little chatter on the topic.crawf wrote:My only wish is they include a mainstream cinema just to boast the night time activity aswell as give the city another attraction. Sure the city already has the wonderful Palace Nova though it desperately needs a mainstream complex. The former city cinemas were either tiny, badly located or plain horrible.
The top of the Myer Centre isn't that bad of an idea, to be honest. I quite like that one, Patrick.Patrick_27 wrote:I'm a massive advocate of a new CBD cinema complex; but this site, unless directly off the mall (and not Gawler Place) - it won't work. The city doesn't desperately need a 'mainstream' cinema - cinema popularity has been on the decline; Palace Nova are probably in the best position, Art House cinema has never been stronger, and their ability to mix that with a selection of popular films at the East End has worked well. Though, I'm with you on another city cinema centrally located; I would love to see Wallis capitalize on this, as a former employee of their Chelsea Cinema it was under serious consideration at the closure of Glenelg and vacating of Chelsea, since then there has been little chatter on the topic.crawf wrote:My only wish is they include a mainstream cinema just to boast the night time activity aswell as give the city another attraction. Sure the city already has the wonderful Palace Nova though it desperately needs a mainstream complex. The former city cinemas were either tiny, badly located or plain horrible.
I'd love to see a complex either at the top of the Myer Centre, or the old David Jones building - both have close access to parking. Otherwise, if a cinema were considered for this site like you've proposed - perhaps they could further expand the retail mix of this development and acquire the site of Woolworths and have the new building face the mall there - build cinemas above that part of the site...
I hope to see this take off, either way!
Bingo. The description & renders from the Hames Sharley site match what was reported in 2012SRW wrote:I think Nathan means to say that the renders of this proposed mixed used development (not the previous residential ones) are now two years old and are likely no longer current.
DON'T RUIN OUR FANTASIES AND FUN WITH YOUR TRUTH, NATHAN!Nathan wrote:Bingo. The description & renders from the Hames Sharley site match what was reported in 2012SRW wrote:I think Nathan means to say that the renders of this proposed mixed used development (not the previous residential ones) are now two years old and are likely no longer current.
A real pity the original renders are not the current design. Would have been impressive on NT.Phantom wrote:DON'T RUIN OUR FANTASIES AND FUN WITH YOUR TRUTH, NATHAN!Nathan wrote:Bingo. The description & renders from the Hames Sharley site match what was reported in 2012SRW wrote:I think Nathan means to say that the renders of this proposed mixed used development (not the previous residential ones) are now two years old and are likely no longer current.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests