News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2746 Post by metro » Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:47 pm

metro wrote:
Matt wrote:God, I hope Yarwood is reelected.
Faces a big obstacle in The Traumatiser though - expecting them to do a few more hatchet jobs on him yet.
Dont worry, the Advertiser will probably dig up some nasty shit, anything to bring him down. Sex Scandals (can be easily fabricated too) are pretty effective, look how well it worked with Mike Rann. :roll:
well we saw that one coming didn't we, now all we need is Indaily to join in with some more anti-yarwood articles :roll:

dsriggs
Legendary Member!
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:18 am

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2747 Post by dsriggs » Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:50 pm

SRW wrote:So really the story here is that Isobel Redmond has misused her parliamentary privilege for at least the second time this year.
Also that she's happy with blaming everybody else for her not leaving home on time.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2748 Post by Nathan » Tue Oct 14, 2014 9:02 pm

If this happened out on the street as she said, then surely you would think people would have seen it, and given that it's the lord mayor and a former opposition leader, it would have made news at the time. The fact that that didn't happen, automatically casts doubt over the story.

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2749 Post by david » Tue Oct 14, 2014 10:05 pm

The Redmond story is a complete fabrication according to my sources.
Councillor David Plumridge's Notes - Issue 121

- Significant Energy Efficiency and CO2 Reductions in the City

- Vote 1 David Plumridge for Area Councillor

- Policy versus Promises

- Decisions from Council Meeting 14 October 2014
Notes from Councillor Issue 121.pdf
(309.01 KiB) Downloaded 114 times
Cllr David Plkumridge AM
Area Councillor,
CITY OF ADELIADE

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5523
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2750 Post by crawf » Tue Oct 14, 2014 10:38 pm

Another day... another anti-Yarwood article. This time it's regarding a Liberal hack who apparently had to put with a tirade of abuse from over a year ago. Though if the abuse was that bad or in her own words "I really mean abuse" then why didn't she report it the media or the police?. And really, blaming the state government and council for delays getting into the city?. How about you improve your time management skills and quit your whinging considering the South Australian taxpayers more than likely paid your journey into the city.

The truth is, this is nothing more than a fabricated scandalised attack on a man that has far more vision and leadership than what Isabel Redmond ever had for this state.

I can not imagine the frustration it would be to in Stephen Yarwood's shoes. Here's a passionate man, that has shown a strong vision than any other Lord Mayor and yet he has continuously been falsely accused, criticised and ridiculed for just about everything. He's got to be the most patient person in Adelaide.

Other cities would jump at the chance to have him lead their city.... which the local media will then cry foul and whinge that he left for greener pastures. Oh Adelaide

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5523
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2751 Post by crawf » Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:42 am

It gets better...

http://www.news.com.au/national/south-a ... 7090442962
“However, the trip, particularly along Pulteney St and North Tce was so slow that ... more than an hour and a quarter after I had left home, I was standing on the footpath outside Parliament waiting for the walk sign to cross King William St feeling somewhat rushed and annoyed.”
“I am sure I speak on behalf of many, in fact the vast majority, when I say that those of us who choose to live in the many pleasant suburbs of this wonderful city are increasingly frustrated by the incessant moves to keep us out of the city unless we are prepared to travel by public transport or pushbike.
Once again more hogwash, this lady is hilarious. Considering there is no bus lanes on either Pulteney Street or North Terrace, maybe perhaps your journey from Stirling was delayed thanks to motorists like yourself that have the mentality that Adelaide is just one big country town. Complaining about traffic congestion and then complaining about the council and State Government trying to ease congestion by encouraging public transport and bicycles makes little to no sense.. But then again it is one of the policies of mayoral candidate Michael Henningson to make the CBD car friendly, isn't that right buddy ol pal?

Image
She recalled the interchange was on a Friday evening around 5pm.
The End.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2752 Post by Will » Wed Oct 15, 2014 11:18 am

From a business perspective I understand why the Advertiser will be running an anti-Yarwood campaign. The most read articles on Adelaide Now tend to be those which bash Adelaide. Thus, someone whom has improved the city and therefore reduced the ability of the Advertiser to run Adelaide bashing articles is obviously not good for business. They would prefer someone with a pissant agenda be elected so that they can return to the glory days of frequent negative articles.

And then there is the ideological perspective. The Advertiser is an inherently conservative newspaper. Although not belonging to a political party, I suspect Yarwood is on the left of the political rainbow. Thus, the Advertiser would prefer "one of them" be elected rather than the "outsider" Yarwood.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2753 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Oct 16, 2014 3:46 pm

Mark Hamilton on Radio Adelaide this morning.

Makes for pretty depressing listening.

https://radio.adelaide.edu.au/wp-conten ... milton.mp3

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2754 Post by Nathan » Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:14 pm

He goes on about the second floor of buildings along Hindley St and Rundle St being empty. What city is he in? Speaking for Rundle St, the upper levels are pretty much all occupied. I'm sure most of Hindley St is the same.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2755 Post by monotonehell » Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:58 pm

Llessur2002 wrote:Mark Hamilton on Radio Adelaide this morning.

Makes for pretty depressing listening.

https://radio.adelaide.edu.au/wp-conten ... milton.mp3
He says that Adelaide is traditionally a 20 minute city. So his solution to keep that tradition going is to encourage more drivers on the roads.

This guy doesn't seem to know what he's talking about. I live on the second story of Rundle street in a heritage building. There's already residences, cafes, restaurants, offices, nightclubs along here in the upper levels. Even some of the basements around here are leased to businesses. There's not much empty space, apart from the normal turnover of closed small businesses. Rundle Mall is in a similar position. Most of the upper floors are utilised, again apart from the turn over of closed small businesses. Hindley Street has been another story, but in recent times this has seen a recovery.

He's rambling out his ignorant arse.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5523
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2756 Post by crawf » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:50 pm

Adelaide says no.
Image


Are there any decent candidates this year?, other than Yarwood.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2757 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:44 pm

crawf wrote:Are there any decent candidates this year?, other than Yarwood.
Doesn't seem so - it's so sad to think that some of the other candidates are stuck so far in the past. It's just plain selfish to hold back the development and progress of a city due to some idealistic 1960's utopian vision of how things used to be in 'the good old days' when you could, apparently, drive your mint green FB Holden directly up to the fourth floor of Harris Scarfe, spin it around Ladieswear, through the checkouts and be back home in time for the 'light hour' on the wireless and a jolly good biscuit.

We won't see the likes of those days again.

Honey of a City
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:42 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2758 Post by Honey of a City » Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:36 am

Llessur2002 wrote:
crawf wrote:Are there any decent candidates this year?, other than Yarwood.
Doesn't seem so - it's so sad to think that some of the other candidates are stuck so far in the past. It's just plain selfish to hold back the development and progress of a city due to some idealistic 1960's utopian vision of how things used to be in 'the good old days' when you could, apparently, drive your mint green FB Holden directly up to the fourth floor of Harris Scarfe, spin it around Ladieswear, through the checkouts and be back home in time for the 'light hour' on the wireless and a jolly good biscuit.

We won't see the likes of those days again.
Lol. And where does one fit in the cup of tea, the Bex and the good lie down with all those nasty bike lanes slowing down the traffic? Not only was Hamilton's radio interview depressing it was seriously frightening for those of us who've celebrated Adelaide's recent awakening from the long sleep, and see the amazing potential of this wonderful place. Here we have a candidate whose opening "idea" in the interview was to "do nothing" (his words), and in fact suspend the Smart Move strategy. Text book conservatism delivered in an old person's voice with more umms and arrs than a 60's lawnmower. Please, please...voters of Adelaide city....no!

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2759 Post by monotonehell » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:15 am

Llessur2002 wrote:...idealistic 1960's utopian vision of how things used to be in 'the good old days' when you could, apparently, drive your mint green FB Holden directly up to the fourth floor of Harris Scarfe, spin it around Ladieswear, through the checkouts and be back home in time for the 'light hour' on the wireless and a jolly good biscuit...
You sir, win the Internets.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2760 Post by Llessur2002 » Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:05 am

Have seen plenty of election posters up throughout the city but not one for Yarwood. Most of them, as previously mentioned, are for Haese and a few predictably lifeless ones for Hamilton.

Is Yarwood running a particularly low-key campaign, or have I just missed them?

Edit - just seen he was interviewed on Radio Adelaide on Monday - haven't listened to it yet as have left my headphones at home...

https://radio.adelaide.edu.au/lord-mayo ... cond-term/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], mattblack and 217 guests