[REJ] Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Oh, right, gotcha.
Must be political season, hey? Fudging the numbers.
Must be political season, hey? Fudging the numbers.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Drove past this one on Sunday morning, fire brigade at the front and smoke coming out of the boarded up windows towards the top. Surprised it didn't make the news?
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Second Sunday morning in a row, fire brigade and smoke! Is this what they call a controlled burn? Lol (Smoke had cleared by time I found a park)
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Ive always wondered how many squatters would camp overnight in this building. Quite a few I guess
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
I see the fire brigade so frequently out the front there I assumed they were using it for training. Squatter mishaps is the more likely scenario, though.
Keep Adelaide Weird
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
I was walking along North Terrace this morning when the fire brigade was there. It was just a training exercise, they had a small sign saying so placed on the footpath..
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Well, there you have it. Training after all.
Keep Adelaide Weird
[REJ] Re: APP: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Offi
Not sure if the office tower has been scrapped?
Type: Application Assessed on Merit
Application Number: DA/981/2014
Lodgement Date: 12/12/2014
Location: GAWLER CHAMBERS, 186-190 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000
Description: Repairs and maintenance to facade.
Applicant Name: ADELAIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS P/L
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
According to Indaily. Maintenece work is about to start on the facade. The redevelopment has been put on hold due to lack of interest in office accomodation at this point in time.
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
i've said it before, still one of my favorite buildings and happy to see this one come up for repairs.
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
The developers have asked for another extension - the 8th I believe 10 years after the initial approval.
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
- gnrc_louis
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Are Adelaide Development Company the ones who sat on the old Planet site for 15 years too? Disgraceful, wish someone serious would buy this site and actually do something with it - even if it was just restoring the original building at this point.Ben wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:00 pmThe developers have asked for another extension - the 8th I believe 10 years after the initial approval.
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
Yep sure is. Notorious for this sort of thing.
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
It should be refused, though we shouldn't assume that means they'll offload the property. It will likely languish longer.
I'd like the government to proactively relieve the developer of the building and restore it, potentially as new headquarters/museum for History Trust SA (which is presently homeless).
I'd like the government to proactively relieve the developer of the building and restore it, potentially as new headquarters/museum for History Trust SA (which is presently homeless).
Keep Adelaide Weird
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2626
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
[REJ] Re: Gawler Chambers Redevelopment | 70m | 16lvls | Office
This kind of thing really irks me - either build it, or don't.Ben wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:00 pmThe developers have asked for another extension - the 8th I believe 10 years after the initial approval.
The SCAP has been recommended to reject the extension. Surely if you haven't built it within 10 years its not going to happen and you can't keep expecting extensions so I agree with this. If the developer thinks they can keep extending it there is no incentive to start work before it lapses.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests