Page 91 of 91
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:01 pm
by claybro
Dvious wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:50 pm
I think the bumpy concrete facings that are installed to the white horizontal banding and balustrades has helped bring the overall aesthetic up.
I see we’re back to bricks on facades again.

I thought we learnt after the North Terrace Stamford. It aged terribly.. didn’t look good in the 70’s and doesn’t look good now. It really surprises me how many of you are happy with this mediocre offering. A uni student could have come up with these designs and treatments. It could have been such a grand and iconic structure given its location.

[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:57 pm
by Patrick_27
claybro wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:01 pm
Dvious wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:50 pm
I think the bumpy concrete facings that are installed to the white horizontal banding and balustrades has helped bring the overall aesthetic up.
I see we’re back to bricks on facades again.

I thought we learnt after the North Terrace Stamford. It aged terribly.. didn’t look good in the 70’s and doesn’t look good now. It really surprises me how many of you are happy with this mediocre offering. A uni student could have come up with these designs and treatments. It could have been such a grand and iconic structure given its location.
The East End Markets apartments (corner of Grenfell and East Tce) aged very well and used bricks on the facade... The Stanford isn't ugly because of the brick, it's ugly because of the window awnings.
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:31 am
by abc
Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:57 pm
claybro wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:01 pm
Dvious wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:50 pm
I think the bumpy concrete facings that are installed to the white horizontal banding and balustrades has helped bring the overall aesthetic up.
I see we’re back to bricks on facades again.

I thought we learnt after the North Terrace Stamford. It aged terribly.. didn’t look good in the 70’s and doesn’t look good now. It really surprises me how many of you are happy with this mediocre offering. A uni student could have come up with these designs and treatments. It could have been such a grand and iconic structure given its location.
The East End Markets apartments (corner of Grenfell and East Tce) aged very well and used bricks on the facade... The Stanford isn't ugly because of the brick, it's ugly because of the window awnings.
which were added around the 80s/90s
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2025 8:03 am
by Nort
Nothing wrong with brick facade, but the fact they are clearly non-connected panels let's things down.
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:05 am
by Mpol02
London has brick facade all over the place and it works wonderfully in bringing in the old and new developments together.
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 2:56 am
by Algernon
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:05 am
London has brick facade all over the place and it works wonderfully in bringing in the old and new developments together.
Brick can be brilliant, tacky and everything in between. I think the main concern with brick on recent developments is when it falls into the categories 1. Aldo's 8 flats on Findon Rd Tan Brick or 2. 25 storey Delfin townhouse... that's when you don't like brick so much
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:42 am
by Mpol02
Of course it can be all things like every other form of glazing.
When done well it can be gorgeous.
This doesn’t look like the cream brick in Findon, though my yiayia may beg to differ
[U/C] Re: [emoji2396][emoji2396] O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:35 am
by Vasco
Best example of modern / commercial scale brick I’ve seen in Adelaide is on ‘The Harrington’ apartment building currently under construction on Prospect Road. It looks like it’s indented into the precast panels.
This looks like a sticker effect similar to Bohem which also lets that build down in a similar fashion.
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 3:50 pm
by Ursus Maritimus
As seen from the distance today:
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2025 4:25 pm
by EBG
Update 26/3/2025- most of the reccent work has been concentrated on fitting out ground flloor and level 2 glazing . pictures show O'connell st from north to south. There is some glazing on street level also.
The crane should come down soon.
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:57 pm
by AndyWelsh
Wood Bagot - May update
“Works commenced on the project in May 2022 and are forecast for completion mid-2025. Construction of the towers is now largely complete, with the team finalizing updates to the podium fitouts.”
https://www.woodsbagot.com/global-studi ... ompletion/
Also
“As a truly mixed-use development, Eighty Eight O’Connell includes apartments, commercial suites and retail tenancies perched on top of an articulated podium structure.Levels one and two will host a series of commercial suites including medical consulting services, wellness amenities, a swimming pool and a large, outdoor terrace.
Level three and above is reserved for residences, comprising 165 apartments across three buildings, connected by a “sky park” elevated garden. With views over picturesque North Adelaide, homes include a mix of two-bed apartments and three-bedroom townhouses. A new rooftop bar and restaurant, Yakisan, will top the spectacular new development, led by locally renowned chef Adam Liston.”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[U/C] Re: 88 O'Connell Street | 63m | 13, 13 and 15 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:21 pm
by 5000
Nort wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 8:03 am
Nothing wrong with brick facade, but the fact they are clearly non-connected panels let's things down.
These look to be 'brick slips'.
Agreed - the disconnect over each pre-cast panel interrupts the eye massively.
The finish here is a far cry from that of the Cullinan on Waymouth Street which used solid bricks; and presumably is somewhat more independent of the concrete structure behind (compared to the sticker bricks here).
A massive pity that a better quality finish wasn't dreamt up for this building.