crawf wrote:More overhead signage
Heading north on Mann Road... I always end up in the wrong lane!
Aidan wrote:Of course. But I'm guessing you mean do many people use the j-series buses between the airport and east of the City? and I don't know the answer to that.?
Ah, yeah. I meant "do many people use the J buses
west of the city?"
Aidan wrote:The bus company had originally wanted the J buses to go straight onto Grenfell Street, but gave into public pressure from NE suburbs residents who wanted a direct bus to the RAH.
Didn't the T500 and T501 used to do the RAH detour? Back in the day where all 54* buses went city <-> TTP and before the JetBus existed.
monotonehell wrote:Some street furniture gets in the way of pedestrians and parked car doors *bang*. More attention should be placed on the holistic layout of such items, how they relate to each other and whether they provide unneccesary clutter -- especially on narrow footpaths. In some places this is compounded by sandwich boards put out by local traders.
For example, parking signs are planted along most streets at about 10m intervals meaning that the side of the footpath closest to the gutter is blocked, which means that two pedestrians walking in opposite directions need to avoid each other sometimes (Gawler Place is a good example of this).
Perhaps parking signs could be suspended somehow or avoided all together by some other road markings.
I agree, however with parking signs isn't there's a very strong legal reason for them to be where they are? As far as I'm aware, the placement of sandwich boards is heavily regulated by the ACC.
____________________________________________________________________
Following on from monotone's post, I've been thinking about the 'alfresco space' a lot of streets have, that is, the area on the footpath that is presumably considered surplus to the needs of pedestrians and is turned into commercial space. As far as I'm aware, the use of this space is exclusive to food businesses for provision of chairs and tables and the business pay a (presumably) considerable fee to council for use of the space. As tenants change over time, as they inevitably do, pockets of unused space appear. A clothes shop has little use for a dining area. This leads to unused sections of the streetscape.
Another
little idea could be for the council to rethink the way they manage this space, and treat it more like
leasable commercial space. This would have two main effects:
- The use of the space need not be restricted to the business with a direct face onto it. It should be possible for a tenant or landlord to sub-lease the space to a third party. This third party could be a neighbour who wishes to have more alfresco dining tables, or a mobile food retailer, similar to the coffee cart that used to hover around the Art Gallery and Hughes Plaza in Adelaide Uni. Or it could be something completely different.
- The use of the space need not be restricted to dining areas. Why can't we have a few little trestle tables of wears, weather permitting? With council approval, of course, and strict rules on permanent structures
Strong consideration would need to be given to the effect of the removal of the space from other uses, but that should already happen with current alfresco areas.
On that note, what do people think of the 'wall' of enclosed areas on Rundle Street, and its barrier effect from the street?