Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#16
Post
by Ho Really » Fri Aug 10, 2018 9:49 pm
They should just build all student accommodation on one city block away from prime locations. Like
PeFe said if these buildings can't be converted to proper apartments at a later stage should things change, they will be an ugly sight! Hopefully Hines is much smarter than the others. My
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
-
bigman
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 3:52 pm
#17
Post
by bigman » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:03 pm
The worry is that this tower, although 36 levels in heights is less than $10m in cost and going to the council rather than the DAC. Does not suggest an ornate design.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
-
timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
#18
Post
by timtam20292 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:09 pm
bigman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:03 pm
The worry is that this tower, although 36 levels in heights is less than $10m in cost and going to the council rather than the DAC. Does not suggest an ornate design.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
The council doesnt get to have a say about building proposals anymore. So I'm not too sure what you are talking about.
Last edited by
timtam20292 on Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mpol03
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am
#19
Post
by Mpol03 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:09 pm
I had no idea the cost was so low fml
-
Pikey
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Sitting Down
#20
Post
by Pikey » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:12 pm
bigman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:03 pm
The worry is that this tower, although 36 levels in heights is less than $10m in cost and going to the council rather than the DAC. Does not suggest an ornate design.
Lets see if the ACC concern about architectural merit is exhibited when the renders of this building are shown.
I wouldn't worry about that, I believe that $10m piece on the DA indicates it falls above the threshold and will be reviewed by the DAC. There is absolutely no way a 36 level tower can be built for less than $10m.
-
Ben
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 7502
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#21
Post
by Ben » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:15 pm
Yes the application is asssed by DAC as it exceeds $10m. I don’t think even in China could they build a 36 level building for that price.
-
baytram366
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
-
Contact:
#22
Post
by baytram366 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:38 am
Not sure if I've missed something here but google maps shows 29 Twin St as the Gays Arcade building. Is this proposal to demolish Gays Arcade or build it on the carpark site directly behind the Ibis?
Baytram 366's Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34520752@N07/collections
-
Pants
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:49 am
- Location: Back Home
#23
Post
by Pants » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:16 pm
baytram366 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:38 am
Not sure if I've missed something here but google maps shows 29 Twin St as the Gays Arcade building. Is this proposal to demolish Gays Arcade or build it on the carpark site directly behind the Ibis?
It’s for the land behind Ibis and is the main reason the Jade Monkey was demolished rather than just for access to build Ibis.
-
wilkiebarkid
- Donating Member
![Donating Member Donating Member](./images/ranks/donor_rank.gif)
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Adelaide
#24
Post
by wilkiebarkid » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:56 pm
Pants wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:16 pm
baytram366 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:38 am
Not sure if I've missed something here but google maps shows 29 Twin St as the Gays Arcade building. Is this proposal to demolish Gays Arcade or build it on the carpark site directly behind the Ibis?
It’s for the land behind Ibis and is the main reason the Jade Monkey was demolished rather than just for access to build Ibis.
It's very narrow!
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/oit4KIA.jpg)
-
arki
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:35 am
#25
Post
by arki » Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:17 pm
With heritage listed properties on the north and west bounderies, street facing on the east and a new tower to it's south there should be no excuse for blank walls on this. I just hope it doesn't take design cues from the nearby Dwell development.
-
Nort
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2216
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm
#26
Post
by Nort » Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:32 pm
arki wrote: ↑Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:17 pm
With heritage listed properties on the north and west bounderies, street facing on the east and a new tower to it's south there should be no excuse for blank walls on this. I just hope it doesn't take design cues from the nearby Dwell development.
New tower on a joining block wouldn't change anything would it? A building should take into account how neighbouring blocks could be used in decades to come.
-
Ben
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 7502
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#27
Post
by Ben » Wed Aug 15, 2018 12:51 pm
ACC has this as 38 levels.
Application Number: S10/43/2018
Type: Schedule 10
Lodged: 09/08/2018
Latest Decision
Location: 27-29 Twin Street, ADELAIDE SA 5000
Description: Construct a 38 Storey student accommodation building accommodating a total of 510 students on vacant land.
Status: Being Assessed
-
HiTouch
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
#28
Post
by HiTouch » Wed Aug 15, 2018 12:58 pm
~129m
-
shiftaling
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Modbury
#29
Post
by shiftaling » Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:51 pm
I guess we can't expect it to be beautiful but the location probably means that it won't be a blight on the skyline.
-
Pikey
- VIP Member
![VIP Member VIP Member](./images/ranks/vip_rank.gif)
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Sitting Down
#30
Post
by Pikey » Wed Aug 15, 2018 3:00 pm
shiftaling wrote: ↑Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:51 pm
I guess we can't expect it to be beautiful but the location probably means that it won't be a blight on the skyline.
How can you make that assertion already?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 0 guests