[COM] City Central 8 | 72m | 20lvls | office

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
aussie2000
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:12 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#166 Post by aussie2000 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:10 pm

does anyone actually have the original render, the very first one, i have a picture of it in my head, it would be great to see it again :)

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#167 Post by rev » Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:13 am

Will wrote:
rev wrote:Wasn't the original render of the entire project when this was first started years back, exactly what we are seeing now? I mean, it was an entire block of similar looking buildings.
From memory(its hazy, shh) everyone back then seemed to be all for it. Now that it's being built building by building, people seem to be unhappy. Why?
A reason could be that City Central was first proposed back in 2003. Adelaide back in 2003 was a very different place to what it is today. Back then we were lucky to have 1 high-rise building U/C. As such the mood of the forum members represented this scenario. Back then we were happy to get anything, as long as it was high-rise. Today, when we have more than 30 high-rise buildings at different stages of development, we aren't as desperate for development, and as a result can become more discerning for what we get.
Yeah understandable.
But my point was, in the original render from what I remember anyway, and I may remember wrongly, the original design for all the buildings was pretty much all the same. As in, the same facade style etc.

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#168 Post by UrbanSG » Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:55 pm

Interesting to see no mention of this one in the latest media release from the ACC referring to the highlights of developments approved at the DAP meeting tonight. It was mentioned in the paper today that this one is going to be around the $180 million mark. I would have thought it would be mentioned if it was approved. It has either been deferred or just not mentioned in the media release. Does anyone have any info?

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#169 Post by david » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:05 am

Tower 8 was refused Development Approval at DAP meeting on Monday night. About 6 detailed reasons were given, including lack of set-backs to Franklin and Bentham Streets and its facade relationships to heritage Darling Building and other heritage-listed buildings, also concerns about inactive frontage to Bentham Street.

Plummo

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#170 Post by Omicron » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:08 am

david wrote:Tower 8 was refused Development Approval at DAP meeting on Monday night. About 6 detailed reasons were given, including lack of set-backs to Franklin and Bentham Streets and its facade relationships to heritage Darling Building and other heritage-listed buildings, also concerns about inactive frontage to Bentham Street.

Plummo
Bless! That will teach the lazy little sods not to turn up with the same plans for every single CC building.

User avatar
Joely
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Adelaide & Brisbane

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#171 Post by Joely » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:10 am

david wrote:Tower 8 was refused Development Approval at DAP meeting on Monday night. About 6 detailed reasons were given, including lack of set-backs to Franklin and Bentham Streets and its facade relationships to heritage Darling Building and other heritage-listed buildings, also concerns about inactive frontage to Bentham Street.

Plummo
Fantastic! Now lets hope they go away and come back with something decent.

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#172 Post by UrbanSG » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:46 am

Wow, so refused and not deferred? That is a fairly big deal for such a big project Aspen would be pissed. Although I didn't hate the proposal it wasn't great and had a lot of problems. Hopefully they come back with something decent this time. We won't see any action for a long time as they will have to go through another application all over again if it hasn't been deferred and instead refused outright.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

[COM] Re: #Proposed: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#173 Post by Shuz » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:49 pm

I'm glad with the decision of this one, and hopefully we can expect something much better out of the next proposal.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3728
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#174 Post by SRW » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:47 pm

Well this is pleasantly surprising. Even more so if it was actually refused.

Let's just hope that they take heed of the complaints.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#175 Post by AtD » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:23 pm

I’m pleasantly surprised. No one here has called for the heads of the DAP yet.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7729
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#176 Post by Ben » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:35 pm

AtD wrote:I’m pleasantly surprised. No one here has called for the heads of the DAP yet.
I don't think anybody liked the building in it's proposed form lol

shaun
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5549
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#177 Post by shaun » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:42 pm

Glad to hear, now lets hope they go back to the drawing board and design something that is decent and taller.

Definitely do not want to see a blank wall.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5909
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#178 Post by Will » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:47 pm

crawf wrote:Glad to hear, now lets hope they go back to the drawing board and design something that is decent and taller.

Definitely do not want to see a blank wall.
That is definately a strong possibility. If the developers are forced to increase the building's setback from both Franklin and Bentham Streets whilst at the same time retain the amount of office space, it is obvious that they will have to increase the height of the building by a couple of floors.

Just build it
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:12 pm

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#179 Post by Just build it » Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:53 pm

Wow, both surprised and heartened. In my last post I said the council sh1tted me for not demanding something better. I take it back*. Good on 'em. This should make the architects think twice about the designs proposed for not only CC8 but the rest of the CC buildings to come and that's a great thing.


* - for now. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[COM] Re: #Deferred: City Central Tower 8 20 Lvl 72M

#180 Post by Ho Really » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:07 pm

Will wrote:
crawf wrote:Glad to hear, now lets hope they go back to the drawing board and design something that is decent and taller.

Definitely do not want to see a blank wall.
That is definately a strong possibility. If the developers are forced to increase the building's setback from both Franklin and Bentham Streets whilst at the same time retain the amount of office space, it is obvious that they will have to increase the height of the building by a couple of floors.
It could end up being more than a couple of floors. What will happen then? Will the council refuse it because it will cast too much shadow? I hope not because I don't want to see Spire's blank walls from Victoria Square.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests