Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#46
Post
by rhino » Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:01 am
Bulldozer wrote:I thought the growers consortium that owns the existing pipeline was going to contribute the other half of the funds and that it was only waiting for the state government to approve the project?
I couldn't find that in the article anywhere, but if that is the case, then I apologise for my rant!
By the way, the pipeline extension got approved last night. Mark Parnell (Greens) is inow sugesting that rather than too late, it's not enough, and it should be extended to the Barossa Valley. From what you're saying, I guess it's up to the growers up there to push their barrow now and get some help with the funding.
cheers,
Rhino
-
AG
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
#47
Post
by AG » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:13 am
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html
City plan to use recycled water
GREG KELTON, STATE EDITOR
April 23, 2008 12:30am
A $5 MILLION plan to save one billion litres of drinking water a year by piping recycled water into city buildings has been proposed to the State Government.
The plan calls for recycled water from Glenelg to be plumbed through all cooling towers in commercial buildings in Adelaide's central business district.
The Property Council plan, to be unveiled today, calls for a $60 million pipeline from the Glenelg WasteWater Treatment Plant, to be extended to allow more city buildings to use the water.
Preliminary planning on the 30km pipeline already is under way with construction expected to begin either late this year or early next year.
The council has written to Premier Mike Rann and Water Security Minister Karlene Maywald outlining the plan.
President James Sarah said there were plans to direct recycled water into what would be Australia's highest rated six-star green building, VS1 in Victoria Square.
The building will be the new home of SA Water.
Under existing plans, the pipeline from Glenelg creates a circuit around the city, irrigating major parklands.
"Since the water is scheduled for non-drinking purposes in VS1, it will be suited for similar purposes in other buildings," Mr Sarah said.
Preliminary estimates by the Property Council show one billion litres of water a year could be saved by directing it into cooling towers.
That is the equivalent of 4000 Olympic-sized swimming pools or enough water to service all units and apartments in the Holdfast Bay Council area.
While the Government would be urged to pay the $5 million for the pipeline extension, building owners would pay the costs of plumbing the recycled water into buildings.
"The $60 million pipeline project is a significant outlay and it makes sense to maximise the state's environmental return for this investment," Mr Sarah said.
He said the $5 million cost was "an insignificant outlay when considering the benefit to the state and the River Murray in saving one billion litres of potable water a year".
Ms Maywald said the Government's intention was to expand the use of the pipeline as demand grew.
Some businesses and local government bodies had signalled they would like to use the recycled water.
"It was always intended this was the first step towards getting the pipeline into the city and we are prepared to work with the business sector to look at ways of saving water," she said.
"The Government has always envisaged there would be more use of the water from the pipeline."
-
Howie
- VIP Member

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
- Location: Adelaide
-
Contact:
#48
Post
by Howie » Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:27 am
Ah this was what Councillor Yarwood was mentioning the other day on the forum. Sounds like a great solution to our cbd water problems. Does that mean we might be able to fill up rymill park lake again?
-
AG
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
#49
Post
by AG » Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:37 am
This is similar to a project that was undertaken in Toronto a few years ago. In Toronto, they used cold water from the bottom of Lake Ontario and piped it directly to Toronto's downtown area for use in building cooling systems.
-
Wayno
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#50
Post
by Wayno » Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:05 pm
fantastic news - sooner is better...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
Edgar
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Adelaide
-
Contact:
#51
Post
by Edgar » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:25 pm
excellent idea, Adelaide city would in no time, be the greenest city in Australia, with so many new buildings winning high green ratings.
-
Omicron
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm
#52
Post
by Omicron » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:43 pm
A good idea indeed. There was an information stall staffed by smartly-dressed council-types in the front foyer of my exclusive boutique fashion retailer (*cough* discount department store), and it looked quite promising based on the plans displayed.
-
Wayno
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#53
Post
by Wayno » Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:50 pm
Anyone know what percentage of Adelaide's annual water consumption this initiative will save? supposedly 1 billion litres will be recycled...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#54
Post
by rhino » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:09 am
Grant Cameron interviewed a woman from the parklands preservation society bout this last week. She was against the idea because it would require building pumping stations in the parklands, and that was just unacceptable.

cheers,
Rhino
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#55
Post
by monotonehell » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:33 am
rhino wrote:Grant Cameron interviewed a woman from the parklands preservation society bout this last week. She was against the idea because it would require building pumping stations in the parklands, and that was just unacceptable.

Some people have agenda so high on their brain that they can't think past it. If you want parklands you need water and if you want water you need the recycling system.

Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
Wayno
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#56
Post
by Wayno » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:47 am
personally i'm not fussed, but i'd prefer not to see an industrial pumping station surrounding by tall mesh fencing in the parklands.
Presumably only one pumping station is required, and it could easily be located adjacent to the parklands - perhaps in the western railyards near keswick/mile end?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#57
Post
by monotonehell » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:10 pm
Wayno wrote:personally i'm not fussed, but i'd prefer not to see an industrial pumping station surrounding by tall mesh fencing in the parklands.
Presumably only one pumping station is required, and it could easily be located adjacent to the parklands - perhaps in the western railyards near keswick/mile end?
I'm not overly fussed either but it makes sense to cost the parklands a little space in a hidden dark corner for
their benefit of more green foliage and water features instead of using some of the railyards site which might be used for better railway purposes or something else.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#58
Post
by rhino » Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:57 pm
There are already pumping stations in the parklands. Some have been there for over a century and are now disused. They are housed in old stone or brick buildings and most people don't even see them, they are so unobtrusive. The woman from the Parklands Preservation Society cited them. It was almost as if she'd got hold of an old E&WS Dept map and gone looking for the things.
cheers,
Rhino
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#59
Post
by monotonehell » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:10 pm
rhino wrote:There are already pumping stations in the parklands. Some have been there for over a century and are now disused. They are housed in old stone or brick buildings and most people don't even see them, they are so unobtrusive...
Exactly.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
Wayno
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#60
Post
by Wayno » Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:14 pm
any idea of the proposed pathway for the pipeline? i presume it would be quite a small diameter pipe...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 4 guests