Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
shaun
- Donating Member

- Posts: 5549
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#61
Post
by shaun » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:18 pm
*goes into a corner and cries*
Nice work Howie, you got me

-
Howie
- VIP Member

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
- Location: Adelaide
-
Contact:
#62
Post
by Howie » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:19 pm
That tower is actually The Bow (Canada)
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=131013
What is the construction period?
Start: 2007
Finish: 2011
Give me some specifics!
Use: Office, Retail, Institutional
Height: (58 Storeys/236m/774') & (7 Storeys)
Gross Floor Area: 217,404m² -- 2,340,117'²
FAR: 12.43
Parking: 1348 Stalls
Estimated Cost: > CAD $1,100,000,000.00
Materials: Steel & Curtain Wall Glass
Sustainability: LEED Gold Equivalent
An absolute beauty of a skyscraper I think. Calgary shares a parallel with Adelaide in that, it built alot of it's wealth from the resources boom which had a tremendous effect on the psyche of it's residents. Adelaide is often compared with Calgary (in terms of population sizes, 1,019,942 people in Calgary), density, and abundance of resources.
Quote From Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calgary
Oil was first discovered in Alberta in 1902,[10] but it did not become a significant industry in the province until 1947 when huge reserves of it were discovered. Calgary quickly found itself at the centre of the ensuing oil boom. The city's economy grew when oil prices increased with the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973. The population increased by 272,000 in the eighteen years between 1971 (403,000) and 1989 (675,000) and another 345,000 in the next eighteen years (to 1,020,000 in 2007).
During these boom years, skyscrapers were constructed at a pace seen by few cities anywhere. The relatively low-rise downtown quickly became dense with tall buildings,[11] a trend that continues to this day.
-
Shuz
- Banned

- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Glandore
#63
Post
by Shuz » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:33 pm
Just to think, if it actually were serious, how cool would this have looked?

-
omada
- Donating Member

- Posts: 686
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Eden Hills
#64
Post
by omada » Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:24 pm
kinda similar skyline too... and notice on the pic of Calgary, the very right hand side tower looks like Westpac House...
-
talrok
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:47 pm
#65
Post
by talrok » Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:58 pm
some of you people out there must be pretty dumb, or working for the ACC .. no matter what day it is this kinda building would not be built in this state .. we can barely get 120m buildings approved and built and debate for months whether a building is 14 or 15 storey ... like who gives a fark!!!
-
shaun
- Donating Member

- Posts: 5549
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#66
Post
by shaun » Tue Apr 01, 2008 3:35 pm
Thats false.
20-22 Currie St was approved, without any dramas especially from NIMBYs. Plus there has been hardly any objection to the countless number of proposals around the city.
The only negative things I can think of is Victoria Park, Tramline Extension and Lecornu Site.
-
Done
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:23 pm
#67
Post
by Done » Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:01 pm
Ouch, a bit of a sore spot there.

It was a good prank Howie, although when I showed my friend, she said it was probably an April fools joke. - Then it all clicked. lol, nice work.
-
skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
#68
Post
by skyliner » Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:19 pm
Nowie, V. bad puppy!
Read this earlier in the day but did not log on - no render and no big black comment about April fool's. The cynic in me then said it was too good to be true. and, what about the ACC - anyway it would be dumbed down. It looks fantastic - that is where we need such a bldg.
ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATE CITY SKYLINE (Like that one in the render)
Jack.
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#69
Post
by monotonehell » Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:57 pm
Hehe silly peoples. Howie was being naughty and deleting all us non-fools' posts last night. I posted this about 5 mins after.

Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
jimmy_2486
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Glenelg-Marion Area
#70
Post
by jimmy_2486 » Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:40 pm
HAHAH what an awesome joke.
However look at the positive spin off it attracted by having this posted?? Did we see anyone say anything bad about it??......
Jee do the ACC purposely try and want us to leave the state or something??
Maybe they have a bet on if they can outdo the interstate migration figures every year or something?
-
Xaragmata
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Adelaide / West
-
Contact:
#71
Post
by Xaragmata » Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:52 pm
After this well-executed April 1 hoax, I'm not sure what to make of this proposal for a mile-high tower in Jeddah.
Nobody seems to suspect a leg-pull ... ???
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1811
Mile-high tower: Saudi prince promises £5bn desert spire TWICE as tall as nearest rival being built
[It is being planned for a new city near the Red Sea port of Jeddah. Behind the scheme is 51-year-old Prince al-Walid bin Talal,
who bought the Savoy for £1.25billion in 2005.]
-
Düsseldorfer
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:52 am
#72
Post
by Düsseldorfer » Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:09 am
yeh while we're at it then...
:wank: yeh the tallest buildings from London and Frankfurt would be a great addition to our skyline,
the new one on the left of the pic is actually fairly believable...to bad its a joke!

-
Shuz
- Banned

- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Glandore
#73
Post
by Shuz » Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:45 am
Im not a huge fan of that London tower, looks bleurgh to me, but the Commerzbank is just stunning. A very sophisicated and sleek tower.
-
Matt
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
- Location: London
#74
Post
by Matt » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:16 pm
What's the tower behind Stamford there?
That looks brilliant.
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2736
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#75
Post
by Ho Really » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:34 pm
talrok wrote:some of you people out there must be pretty dumb, or working for the ACC .. no matter what day it is this kinda building would not be built in this state .. we can barely get 120m buildings approved and built and debate for months whether a building is 14 or 15 storey ... like who gives a fark!!!
Developers can still submit projects, and who says they won't get approved at 158 metres? It's just an extra 20 metres or thereabouts more than Westpac. It's also in the right part of the CBD. The ACC obviously needs time to sort things out before they give us that extra height. We need to be patient it seems.
Cheers
P.S. Thanks for being cheeky Howie.

Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 7 guests