Page 54 of 60

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2022 11:18 pm
by Norman
More photos of Bentham Street, it should be done by the end of the year.

Image

Image

Image

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:42 pm
by A-Town
Unsure if it's related to the final stage of the Market to Riverbank Link Project or not, but this week there have been underground cable locator workers on Pitt St.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:54 pm
by SRW
Damn. Bentham Street reopened to traffic today and the 'upgrade' is apparently complete but for street furniture and soft landscaping. It is much lower spec than previous upgrades, all asphalt/concrete (no stone) with trees on only one side. I wouldn't mind so much — tbh I would honestly prefer more streetscapes down well enough than fewer done great — but for the fact the journey is so inconsistent through the supposed 'Riverbank to Market' link and very far from the concept. There's nothing here to indicate this is an important or linked route. It's more like a (somewhat greened) driveway.

A few quick snaps:

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:55 pm
by SRW
One more:
IMG_3607.jpg

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:59 pm
by abc
SRW wrote:
Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:55 pm
One more:
IMG_3607.jpg
with no demarcation between the pedestrian area and the vehicle road, this seems a bit of a safety hazard

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 6:22 pm
by SRW
abc wrote:
Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:59 pm
SRW wrote:
Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:55 pm
One more:
IMG_3607.jpg
with no demarcation between the pedestrian area and the vehicle road, this seems a bit of a safety hazard
That's really not an issue. Shared roads are common enough throughout the city and the street is now one-way southbound but for the section next to the Peppers hotel. Parking/loading is also allocated to the eastern side and trees to the west, so there is demarcation. If anything, the bitumen road through the middle should be of the same treatment so as not to deter pedestrians to the narrow edges.

Although funnily, on the east cars will park on the high aggregate concrete while pedestrians get asphalt.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:10 pm
by Hex
Moonta St, Gawler Pl connecting to Rundle Mall, and Bank street have the same design as this one with the road at the same height. Have not felt that any of those were unsafe, much the opposite really.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:45 pm
by abc
Hex wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:10 pm
Moonta St, Gawler Pl connecting to Rundle Mall, and Bank street have the same design as this one with the road at the same height. Have not felt that any of those were unsafe, much the opposite really.
Moonta St is a pedestrian mall with no traffic, Gawler place North is a dead end with no traffic. Bank Street is an obstacle course which slows traffic down.

There's no equivalence here.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 7:12 pm
by Hex
abc wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:45 pm
Hex wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:10 pm
Moonta St, Gawler Pl connecting to Rundle Mall, and Bank street have the same design as this one with the road at the same height. Have not felt that any of those were unsafe, much the opposite really.
Moonta St is a pedestrian mall with no traffic, Gawler place North is a dead end with no traffic. Bank Street is an obstacle course which slows traffic down.

There's no equivalence here.
I don't believe there are any restrictions to driving on Moonta st, the signage just says "Shared zone", but its blocked in the middle so its only useful for deliveries. Would be interesting to see what they finish this off with, blocking it in the middle would still allow access to all the driveways without allowing cars to pick up any kind of speed. Either that or a concrete bench obstacle course. I don't think there is really anything special about those streets other than the obstructions which have been placed to make it inconvenient to drive fast on.

Aside from that, I took a look at this in person today and I hope they aren't done with it, it feels very poorly done. The surface is loose and gritty like 20 year old pavers which have eroded away. The patchwork of the concrete, asphalt and new stone stuff looks awful. Will wait till its officially done before final judgement though.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2022 1:48 pm
by ChillyPhilly
abc wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:45 pm
Hex wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:10 pm
Moonta St, Gawler Pl connecting to Rundle Mall, and Bank street have the same design as this one with the road at the same height. Have not felt that any of those were unsafe, much the opposite really.
Moonta St is a pedestrian mall with no traffic, Gawler place North is a dead end with no traffic. Bank Street is an obstacle course which slows traffic down.

There's no equivalence here.
Cars need to be banned from Bank St altogether.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:15 pm
by 1NEEDS2POST
ChillyPhilly wrote:
Fri Dec 02, 2022 1:48 pm
abc wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:45 pm
Hex wrote:
Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:10 pm
Moonta St, Gawler Pl connecting to Rundle Mall, and Bank street have the same design as this one with the road at the same height. Have not felt that any of those were unsafe, much the opposite really.
Moonta St is a pedestrian mall with no traffic, Gawler place North is a dead end with no traffic. Bank Street is an obstacle course which slows traffic down.

There's no equivalence here.
Cars need to be banned from Bank St altogether.
It doesn't look like a road and that confuses pedestrians who step out in front of cars. Either cars should be banned or it should be made to look more road-like.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:19 am
by Llessur2002
1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:15 pm
It doesn't look like a road and that confuses pedestrians who step out in front of cars. Either cars should be banned or it should be made to look more road-like.
The whole idea is to blur the distinction between the roadway and footpaths to naturally slow traffic.

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2016/02/08/ ... p-traffic/

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:48 pm
by abc
Llessur2002 wrote:
Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:19 am
1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Sun Jan 08, 2023 7:15 pm
It doesn't look like a road and that confuses pedestrians who step out in front of cars. Either cars should be banned or it should be made to look more road-like.
The whole idea is to blur the distinction between the roadway and footpaths to naturally slow traffic.

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2016/02/08/ ... p-traffic/
this isn't the culture in Australia

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:43 pm
by Llessur2002
Only because we haven't been doing this sort of thing for long enough.

Re: News & Discussion: Laneway & Streetscape Projects

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:24 pm
by abc
Llessur2002 wrote:
Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:43 pm
Only because we haven't been doing this sort of thing for long enough.
not worth killing pedestrians for, while we wait a millennium to transform into Europe