[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2023 6:56 pm
Which section of South Road/NSM are these latest property acquisitions for?
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
https://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3172
Which section of South Road/NSM are these latest property acquisitions for?
I think that is the area in which the tunnel boring machine will be assembled. Presumably it requires a fair amount of space and time to assemble and get ready.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:00 pmPlenty of properties between Celtic Ave and the Tonsley Hotel have been acquired, boarded up and/or demolished.
Correct. Also, properties southwest of the Gallipoli Underpass have been demolished, as I may have previously reported.SBD wrote:I think that is the area in which the tunnel boring machine will be assembled. Presumably it requires a fair amount of space and time to assemble and get ready.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:00 pmPlenty of properties between Celtic Ave and the Tonsley Hotel have been acquired, boarded up and/or demolished.
Around South/Richmond Road.
Oh right, been a while since I've been down that way I try to avoid South Road for obvious reasons.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:57 pmCorrect. Also, properties southwest of the Gallipoli Underpass have been demolished, as I may have previously reported.SBD wrote:I think that is the area in which the tunnel boring machine will be assembled. Presumably it requires a fair amount of space and time to assemble and get ready.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:00 pmPlenty of properties between Celtic Ave and the Tonsley Hotel have been acquired, boarded up and/or demolished.
So "over 100 trees removed" is replaced by "minimal tree removal" - I wonder how many fewer trees that is.HeapsGood wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 1:50 pmThere is an interactive map here and loads of cool new youtube videos, ICYMI
https://dit.sa.gov.au/nsc/torrens-to-da ... oject-maps
eg.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkT72Pxd_rQ
I didn't realise they ditched the anzac overpass, i must keep up with the news
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV91U7B6g4o
The Port Road southbound exit traffic light queue occasionally extends down the ramp. I can't imagine that there is much less traffic coming from the south and wanting to use Anzac Highway. The original solution was similar to the one to Ayliffes Road. I haven't noticed if that queue ever extends back to the expressway. The next traffic lights are a bit further away, but Anzac Highway is wider than Ayliffes Road too. The criticism of the original plan was that the bridge was only one lane wide. An alternate solution could have been to make it a bit wider. like Liberal did to the Labor plan for a single lane bridge at Port Wakefield.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 10:11 amThere's no denying that the updated renders and videos are a bit embellished, but I can't disagree the changes are improvements over the original design.
At peak times the Ayliffes Rd flyover is backed down the ramp, albeit never stopped, just moving extremely slowly. I have seen it backed up along the motorway to the Flinders Rd bridge, but in that instance I assumed there was a major accident somewhere on Goodwood and decided to go the other way, where I found South Rd was gridlocked back to the Ayliffes Rd flyover, and then I got stopped trying to turn onto Cross Rd by three trains in a row, sat there for 10 minutes waiting for our turn in the traffic light cycle only to have it stolen by a train yet again. Just couldn't win that day.SBD wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 12:36 pmThe Port Road southbound exit traffic light queue occasionally extends down the ramp. I can't imagine that there is much less traffic coming from the south and wanting to use Anzac Highway. The original solution was similar to the one to Ayliffes Road. I haven't noticed if that queue ever extends back to the expressway. The next traffic lights are a bit further away, but Anzac Highway is wider than Ayliffes Road too. The criticism of the original plan was that the bridge was only one lane wide. An alternate solution could have been to make it a bit wider. like Liberal did to the Labor plan for a single lane bridge at Port Wakefield.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 10:11 amThere's no denying that the updated renders and videos are a bit embellished, but I can't disagree the changes are improvements over the original design.
We had a couple of pages of discussion on them at the time, but certainly no harm in them being brought back up for anyone who missed it over the busy end of year period!