[CAN] New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#451 Post by Ben » Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:36 am

The last few days there’s has been lots of works on site cleaning it up and doing some works to the fence. Also looked like they were doing repairs to the electrical building on the corner.

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1397
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[CAN] New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#452 Post by timtam20292 » Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:28 pm

Beat me to it Ben!

Here’s what the site looked like yesterday afternoon.

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

EBG
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2965
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#453 Post by EBG » Sat Mar 16, 2024 2:22 pm

Nothing to see here this was just another site clean-up and refence. Wake me up when there is a tower crane on site (2025.2030,2040...........

User avatar
baytram366
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
Contact:

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#454 Post by baytram366 » Fri Mar 22, 2024 9:40 am

I used to work not far from this site ten years ago. It was sad to see it sitting empty then and still is. I really don't understand why heritage buildings and other properties are allowed to be bulldozed when sites like this sit vacant for decades on end especially in a capital city. Does this stuff happen in any of the eastern states? I doubt it
Baytram 366's Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34520752@N07/collections

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#455 Post by [Shuz] » Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:14 am

The Adelaide CBD is -huge- compared to the size of CBDs in other cities within Australia. Unfortunately, as a result of its geographical size, the problem of abandoned and vacant building sites will always be a problem.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#456 Post by abc » Fri Mar 22, 2024 1:31 pm

[Shuz] wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:14 am
The Adelaide CBD is -huge- compared to the size of CBDs in other cities within Australia. Unfortunately, as a result of its geographical size, the problem of abandoned and vacant building sites will always be a problem.
yeah no that's not it

the City of Adelaide is not all CBD...most of it is residential. The CBD is Grote/Wakefield to North Terrace and Pulteney to Morphett St.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#457 Post by [Shuz] » Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:40 pm

Google Maps, the ABS, planning agencies, etc. all say otherwise, but you do you boo.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests