[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
rogue
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Over here

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#961 Post by rogue » Fri May 05, 2023 1:17 pm

I would love to see a national indigenous cultures centre in Australia and preferrably Adelaide, but struggle to comprehend how a centre in Adelaide would put us "on the map" more so than centres listed interstate in the excellent article that gnrc_louis posted on 24/4.

Perhaps time for a new idea for the site that is unique and difficult to replicate…

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2068
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#962 Post by Llessur2002 » Fri May 05, 2023 3:25 pm

[Shuz] wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 12:57 pm
Technically, the Labor Malinouskas Government is actually more right-wing than the previous Liberal Marshall Government.
I can see the argument might apply to Malinouskas vs Marshall but given some of the 'interesting' characters on the former Liberal government's benches I'd be reluctant to apply that to the governments as a whole.

Either way, the Malinouskas government has just successfully legislated a voice to SA's Parliament and generally makes positive noises about advancing Aboriginal issues. An Aboriginal Arts and Culture centre feels very much up their street so to appear to be gradually backing away from the proposal suggests to me that all is not as rosy in the business case department as some would hope.

I might be completely wrong - the government might decide to throw another $100M at the project to make it, hopefully, a truly world-class institution. If the numbers stack up and benefits materialise then I'll be fully supportive of the venture.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#963 Post by abc » Fri May 05, 2023 5:00 pm

Indigenous art sector says sales have dropped after allegations of interference by white staff at Tjala Arts
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-05/ ... c_news_web

APY Aboriginal art centre denies any wrongdoing over claims white staff interfere with Indigenous paintings
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-22/ ... /102236264

maybe we should just cut out the middleman and call it the white feminist art centre

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7479
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#964 Post by Ben » Fri May 05, 2023 5:23 pm

What about we think big and think to the future. Every man and their dog are doing indigenous galleries.

What about a museum of Space History and Exploration, right next to the Space agency. Build something futuristic, unique and adaptable.

Incorporate a GoMaFA

Gallery of Modern and Future Art

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#965 Post by SBD » Fri May 05, 2023 8:56 pm

Maybe instead of exhibits under the generic banners of "Indigenous Australian" or "Aboriginal culture", a new gallery could focus on the diversity and difference across our first nation cultures. We all know the name of the group named in a Welcome to/Acknowledgement of Country, but how many of us can actually describe the differences between Kaurna, Ngadjuri, Narungga, Peramangk and Ngarrindjeri (all close to Adelaide) for example? Not just where they live(d), but how are they different from the neighbours in the way we can distinguish Croweaters from Sandgropers or French from Germans?

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 693
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#966 Post by Spotto » Sat May 06, 2023 8:07 pm

[Shuz] wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 12:57 pm
Technically, the Labor Malinouskas Government is actually more right-wing than the previous Liberal Marshall Government.
How do you figure that?

Mpol02
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:06 am

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#967 Post by Mpol02 » Sat May 06, 2023 11:07 pm

Given his stance on suburban sprawl, and not being a fan of public transport, it would seem he is more conservative

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6032
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#968 Post by rev » Sun May 07, 2023 11:48 am

abc wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Indigenous art sector says sales have dropped after allegations of interference by white staff at Tjala Arts
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-05/ ... c_news_web

APY Aboriginal art centre denies any wrongdoing over claims white staff interfere with Indigenous paintings
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-22/ ... /102236264

maybe we should just cut out the middleman and call it the white feminist art centre
What the does this shit have to do with this development?

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#969 Post by abc » Sun May 07, 2023 12:54 pm

rev wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 11:48 am
abc wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Indigenous art sector says sales have dropped after allegations of interference by white staff at Tjala Arts
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-05/ ... c_news_web

APY Aboriginal art centre denies any wrongdoing over claims white staff interfere with Indigenous paintings
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-22/ ... /102236264

maybe we should just cut out the middleman and call it the white feminist art centre
What the does this shit have to do with this development?
everything

the development is based on a fraudulent industry

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#970 Post by Patrick_27 » Sun May 07, 2023 10:02 pm

abc wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 12:54 pm
rev wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 11:48 am
abc wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Indigenous art sector says sales have dropped after allegations of interference by white staff at Tjala Arts
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-05/ ... c_news_web

APY Aboriginal art centre denies any wrongdoing over claims white staff interfere with Indigenous paintings
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-22/ ... /102236264

maybe we should just cut out the middleman and call it the white feminist art centre
What the does this shit have to do with this development?
everything

the development is based on a fraudulent industry
Not sure how genuine artefacts are ‘fraudulent’? I don’t have a problem with people seeing this site as having other potential but you’ve defended yourself as not having a chip on your shoulder about Aboriginal matters (education, culture and the like) but you make comments that kind of sound like it… Not having a go, just trying to understand what your resounding negativity towards this project and seemingly broader education of these cultures is?

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#971 Post by Patrick_27 » Sun May 07, 2023 10:04 pm

rogue wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 1:17 pm
I would love to see a national indigenous cultures centre in Australia and preferrably Adelaide, but struggle to comprehend how a centre in Adelaide would put us "on the map" more so than centres listed interstate in the excellent article that gnrc_louis posted on 24/4.

Perhaps time for a new idea for the site that is unique and difficult to replicate…
The sheer breadth of our state’s collection would set us part.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#972 Post by abc » Mon May 08, 2023 1:10 am

Patrick_27 wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 10:02 pm
abc wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 12:54 pm
rev wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 11:48 am


What the does this shit have to do with this development?
everything

the development is based on a fraudulent industry
Not sure how genuine artefacts are ‘fraudulent’? I don’t have a problem with people seeing this site as having other potential but you’ve defended yourself as not having a chip on your shoulder about Aboriginal matters (education, culture and the like) but you make comments that kind of sound like it… Not having a go, just trying to understand what your resounding negativity towards this project and seemingly broader education of these cultures is?
the area was promised by the Rann government as being earmarked to return to parklands

instead we have a cynical political vanity project which won't put this place on the map any more than a one way freeway when we have under resourced critical infrastructure in need of funding

if we had such rich world class artefacts in storage then they'd be in the museum and art gallery in place of the existing items which aren't bringing people from all over the world to visit

Vasco
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:02 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#973 Post by Vasco » Mon May 08, 2023 4:33 am

abc wrote:
Patrick_27 wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 10:02 pm
abc wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 12:54 pm
everything

the development is based on a fraudulent industry
Not sure how genuine artefacts are ‘fraudulent’? I don’t have a problem with people seeing this site as having other potential but you’ve defended yourself as not having a chip on your shoulder about Aboriginal matters (education, culture and the like) but you make comments that kind of sound like it… Not having a go, just trying to understand what your resounding negativity towards this project and seemingly broader education of these cultures is?
the area was promised by the Rann government as being earmarked to return to parklands

instead we have a cynical political vanity project which won't put this place on the map any more than a one way freeway when we have under resourced critical infrastructure in need of funding

if we had such rich world class artefacts in storage then they'd be in the museum and art gallery in place of the existing items which aren't bringing people from all over the world to visit
Rann promised a portion to be returned, nothing ever as large as that.

Nevertheless, not the first and won’t be the last time that policies and decisions change.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2068
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#974 Post by Llessur2002 » Mon May 08, 2023 9:46 am

Patrick_27 wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 10:04 pm
The sheer breadth of our state’s collection would set us part.
Is there somewhere that describes this collection? Google has not been my friend here.

Does it have significant breadth and diversity to allow meaningful rotation, or is it just large?

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6032
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#975 Post by rev » Mon May 08, 2023 10:32 am

abc wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 12:54 pm
rev wrote:
Sun May 07, 2023 11:48 am
abc wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Indigenous art sector says sales have dropped after allegations of interference by white staff at Tjala Arts
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-05/ ... c_news_web

APY Aboriginal art centre denies any wrongdoing over claims white staff interfere with Indigenous paintings
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-22/ ... /102236264

maybe we should just cut out the middleman and call it the white feminist art centre
What the does this shit have to do with this development?
everything

the development is based on a fraudulent industry
Aboriginal culture is fraudulent? :|

It's telling that you see no problem with the rest of the development occurring on the old rah site..

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 32 guests