[PRO] 10 Anzac Highway | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2498
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#91 Post by SBD » Fri Oct 02, 2020 1:54 pm

gnrc_louis wrote:
Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:40 am
rev wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:23 pm
gnrc_louis wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:56 pm
Actually, during the “full employment” years of the 50s and 60s there was probably more public housing for low and middle income workers. It also didn’t have the stigma that it sadly has now.
You mean like the housing provided for returned service people as part of their service to the nation?
Yes, but also just public housing in general was more common and accepted in that era for people on lower incomes.
There was a lot of public housing built in the Elizabeth area in the 1950s and 1960s for factory workers such as at Holden, WRE (technicians and scientists), Levi and various other large factories that have since shrunk or closed. I'm not sure when or which government changed the policy settings to make Housing Trust predominantly for unemployed people who couldn't afford to live anywhere else, rather than for working families.

It might have been 1980s that a lot of Housing Trust houses were sold to their tenants? Presumably this was pushed as "achieving the great Australian dream of home ownership".

[Moderator, feel free to move this to the pub if we are too far off track]

Eurostar
Legendary Member!
Posts: 921
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#92 Post by Eurostar » Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:49 pm

Prior to Playford Alive they were demolishing houses in Smithfield Plains , some of the Housing Trust were offered for sale in 1999/2000

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2498
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#93 Post by SBD » Sat Oct 03, 2020 2:09 pm

Eurostar wrote:
Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:49 pm
Prior to Playford Alive they were demolishing houses in Smithfield Plains , some of the Housing Trust were offered for sale in 1999/2000
I know a couple who bought their home around that time in Munno Para (they were already the tenants). I also know someone who lives in the house she and her husband moved in to when they arrived in Australia in the 1960s in Elizabeth Downs. When she moved in, they had ocean views!! I think her husband worked for WRE.

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 681
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#94 Post by Spotto » Sun Oct 04, 2020 3:31 am

rev wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:51 pm
Sorry but more public housing is wrong. There isn't enough employment, so why should such an even bigger burden be put on those who do have jobs?
Provide employment, fix the damn economy and there wont be such an increased need for the government to provide housing.

These two sites should be sold off to private developers to develop, housing, apartments, retail.
Studies literally show that it’s better for the economy to give those in need a “leg up” with public housing than it is to sweep them aside and make it someone else’s problem. Why is there such a stigma around those on lower incomes or unemployed having “not earned” public housing? I know good people who’d give an arm and a leg for even a half decent place to live. Building our way out of COVID is one of the post-COVID approaches being discussed, why not kill two birds with one stone? Stimulate the economy with infrastructure and at the end of it have somewhere affordable for people to live who can then stabilise their lives and then contribute back into the economy?

Australia already has an affordable/public housing shortage which is only going to increase. COVID is also contributing. It’s more of a “burden” to not help these people.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 5996
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#95 Post by rev » Sun Oct 04, 2020 1:16 pm

Spotto wrote:
Sun Oct 04, 2020 3:31 am
rev wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 5:51 pm
Sorry but more public housing is wrong. There isn't enough employment, so why should such an even bigger burden be put on those who do have jobs?
Provide employment, fix the damn economy and there wont be such an increased need for the government to provide housing.

These two sites should be sold off to private developers to develop, housing, apartments, retail.
Studies literally show that it’s better for the economy to give those in need a “leg up” with public housing than it is to sweep them aside and make it someone else’s problem. Why is there such a stigma around those on lower incomes or unemployed having “not earned” public housing? I know good people who’d give an arm and a leg for even a half decent place to live. Building our way out of COVID is one of the post-COVID approaches being discussed, why not kill two birds with one stone? Stimulate the economy with infrastructure and at the end of it have somewhere affordable for people to live who can then stabilise their lives and then contribute back into the economy?

Australia already has an affordable/public housing shortage which is only going to increase. COVID is also contributing. It’s more of a “burden” to not help these people.
I also said that there's plenty of people, single parents & their kids and so on, who are in need but are on waiting lists while the scumbags who trash public housing and their neighbourhoods get placed straight away. Quite clearly my opinion isn't that we shouldn't provide public housing, but that it should be provided to the right people who deserve help and not the lowlife scum who abuse the system and cost the tax payer more and more each year to clean up their mess.

The government is rebuilding many old trust homes. The amount of junky scum that don't work that I've seen get placed in these brand new homes is disgusting and appalling when you consider there are people who desperately need that little bit of assistance but can't get it.

If the economy is fixed and jobs created then those who actually need help will be able to get jobs because they are the ones who are likely to go and seek employment to get them selves out of the circumstances they've unfortunately found them selves in. You then don't need to provide as much government housing, or as much new stock.

The system is broken. Building more public housing isn't going to fix the system. Addressing the issues within the system will fix the system. Why are the junkies who choose to be unemployed losers get looked after quicker then those who desperately need help?

The burden isn't to help people who need it, and provide assistance for them.
The burden is that we are wasting tax payers money on junkies and losers who choose to be unemployed, who have no intention of ever working, who also damage public housing that they are provided. That is the burden.

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 818
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#96 Post by bits » Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:05 pm


rev wrote: I also said that there's plenty of people, single parents & their kids and so on, who are in need but are on waiting lists while the scumbags who trash public housing and their neighbourhoods get placed straight away. Quite clearly my opinion isn't that we shouldn't provide public housing, but that it should be provided to the right people who deserve help and not the lowlife scum who abuse the system and cost the tax payer more and more each year to clean up their mess.

The government is rebuilding many old trust homes. The amount of junky scum that don't work that I've seen get placed in these brand new homes is disgusting and appalling when you consider there are people who desperately need that little bit of assistance but can't get it.
What would you do with the lowlife scum?
I think the trick is giving them the house is in fact societies cheapest way out once society failed to educate them better.
If you don't give them a house they will just take one and the police costs more than the house.
Putting them in jail costs more money than the house.

Sucky people are difficult to deal with.

I assume those that can't get a house are still considered functional people that will likely sort things out themselves.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 5996
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#97 Post by rev » Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:33 pm

bits wrote:
Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:05 pm
rev wrote: I also said that there's plenty of people, single parents & their kids and so on, who are in need but are on waiting lists while the scumbags who trash public housing and their neighbourhoods get placed straight away. Quite clearly my opinion isn't that we shouldn't provide public housing, but that it should be provided to the right people who deserve help and not the lowlife scum who abuse the system and cost the tax payer more and more each year to clean up their mess.

The government is rebuilding many old trust homes. The amount of junky scum that don't work that I've seen get placed in these brand new homes is disgusting and appalling when you consider there are people who desperately need that little bit of assistance but can't get it.
What would you do with the lowlife scum?
I think the trick is giving them the house is in fact societies cheapest way out once society failed to educate them better.
If you don't give them a house they will just take one and the police costs more than the house.
Putting them in jail costs more money than the house.

Sucky people are difficult to deal with.

I assume those that can't get a house are still considered functional people that will likely sort things out themselves.
We're drifting way off topic now.
How I would deal with these animals would probably horrify some on this site so I wont post that. But we treat our indigenous peoples worse.

Lets get this thread back on topic...
There was an article this weekend about redeveloping the showgrounds in light of this site likely becoming housing now.
Apparently the government is in talks with the feds or ADF about taking over Keswick barracks too.
There's probably a bit of heritage listed stuff on both sites though, but I think if they can take over especially the showgrounds raise what they can to the ground and redevelop it into high density housing it would be a great outcome.
Most of what's held indoors at the showgrounds could be held at the convention centre and entertainment centre.
The royal show it self could be held in any number of parklands that surround the city such as Victoria Park, no big loss.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#98 Post by Patrick_27 » Mon Oct 05, 2020 5:56 pm

rev wrote:
Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:33 pm
Most of what's held indoors at the showgrounds could be held at the convention centre and entertainment centre.
The royal show it self could be held in any number of parklands that surround the city such as Victoria Park, no big loss.
You have a really warped perspective of what is required to hold the royal show and how much of an asset it is to the state, furthermore, you forget that the showgrounds are owned by the Royal Agricultural & Horticultural Society not the state government... So any of what you've just suggested it not going to happen.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 5996
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#99 Post by rev » Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:09 am

JLL has this site up for sale.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#100 Post by Patrick_27 » Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:29 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:09 am
JLL has this site up for sale.
Hold up, didn't the government in conjunction with Renewal SA buy this one, or am I thinking of somewhere else?

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#101 Post by how good is he » Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:36 pm

Yes its RenewalSA selling it now. I am guessing this way they can better control/veto what a developer does on the site and chose who they sell it to [so a sale is not just based on the price they achieve] for a theoretical better outcome. Some ideas I have heard in the past is a % for social/affordable housing, so many new jobs created or apprentices hired for the build.. etc etc

User avatar
gnrc_louis
Legendary Member!
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#102 Post by gnrc_louis » Fri Jun 17, 2022 10:44 am

Can someone please post this article: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/subscrib ... our=append

tyler
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 19, 2020 12:33 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#103 Post by tyler » Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:21 pm

Anzac Hwy Le Cornu site redevelopment to feature ‘Market Square’
Developers have been selected to transform the former Le Cornu site on Anzac Hwy, and they’ve revealed the first images of their vision.

A “piazza-style Market Square” will form the centrepiece of a $250m redevelopment of the former Le Cornu site in Forestville.

A consortium comprising of the Chapley family’s Commercial Retail Group, Perth-based housing developer Peet and local group Buildtec has been selected to develop the site, which will accommodate a mix of housing, retail and commercial outlets and public open spaces.

The Chapleys are known for redefining the supermarket experience for customers, with the line up of live music, events, in-store dining and other offerings at their Frewville and Pasadena Foodland stores winning global plaudits.

Image
Artist's impression of the piazza-style "Market Square" to be developed at the former Le Cornu site on Anzac Hwy in Forestville. Picture: Supplied by Renewal SA
They will operate a similar store at Forestville, featuring a specialist butcher, seafood outlet, florist, artisan bakery, and a range of stores showcasing local South Australian produce, growers, farmers, fishers and food manufacturers.

Commercial Retail Group director Spero Chapley said the consortium had a vision to create a project and experience “unrivalled in Australia”, with a bustling, piazza-style “Market Square” at its heart.

“We have drawn inspiration from the small, bustling European towns where the homes, squares and markets, and their scents, colour, sounds and architecture entice you to linger and explore with a new experience around every corner,” he said.

“South Australia is known for its exceptional food and beverage experiences and the high-quality eateries serving its locally grown produce will no doubt be a drawcard for local, interstate and international visitors.”

Image
Nick and Spero Chapley, who run the award-winning Foodland Frewville and Pasadena supermarkets. Picture: Roy VanDerVegt
The “Market Square” precinct includes an open area framed by eateries, and is designed to host food and cultural events. A basement car park will offer more than 500 spaces for visitors.

Dubbed Locale, the broader development of the 3.6ha former Le Cornu site is expected to create 900 direct and indirect jobs during construction, and 500 ongoing jobs across retail, services, education and hospitality.

Housing and Urban Development Minister Nick Champion said the winning consortium’s plans represented a “bold vision” for the long-dormant site.

“This represents a significant investment in infrastructure, amenity, housing and jobs,” he said.

“Under its mandate to deliver transformational property projects that drive economic growth, Renewal SA has achieved a bold vision for the former Le Cornu site in partnership with the Locale consortium that demonstrates the power of combining local knowledge and cross-sector collaborations.”

Image
The “Market Square” will showcase local producers. Picture: Supplied by Renewal SA
A period of community consultation will follow the release of plans for the site, which was acquired by Renewal SA in September 2020 after German retailer Kaufland abandoned plans to build a supermarket there.

The land has been vacant since October 2016 when Le Cornu ended its operations in South Australia.

The Advertiser reported last November that Renewal SA had entered exclusive negotiations with the Locale consortium.

As part of the deal, Commercial Retail Group will own and operate the “Market Square” component of the project.

Early designs developed by Renewal SA suggested around 300 homes could be built on the site, with 15 per cent set aside for affordable housing.

Further details about the broader project will be revealed on Friday.

Buildtec, led by the Carrocci family, is overseeing developments including the $120m Norwood Green apartment and townhouse project at the former Caroma site on Magill Rd, while Peet is delivering residential projects including at Tonsley and at the former police academy site in Taperoo.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6386
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#104 Post by Norman » Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:29 pm

This looks very promising from what's been described so far, and the Chapley family supermarkets have been huge drawcards for their other stores. Very excited to see more details of this project!

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3543
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[PRO] Re: [CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#105 Post by SRW » Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:48 pm

Early designs developed by Renewal SA suggested around 300 homes could be built on the site, with 15 per cent set aside for affordable housing.

Further details about the broader project will be revealed on Friday.
Much respect for the Chapleys, but their business proposal is a secondary objective for this site IMO — residential uplift should be primary. I'll be awaiting the futher details from Renewal SA because 300 homes (and only ~45 affordable) seems a big miss in the context of an ongoing housing crisis.
Keep Adelaide Weird

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests