Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
Ben
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7718
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#226
Post
by Ben » Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:12 pm
Nort wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
The king returns: Capture.JPG
The advertiser will think that's real again and it will be in tomorrows paper

-
CDJ
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 2:30 pm
#227
Post
by CDJ » Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:03 pm
Nort wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
The king returns: Capture.JPG
Hahahaha - I couldn't believe it when the Advertiser published that horrendous photoshop

-
Mpol02
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:06 am
#228
Post
by Mpol02 » Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:04 pm
Hahahaha honestly given some of the crap we’ve had, that old beast wouldn’t be that bad.
Thanks for clarifying. I guess with anything if it’s quality then it should look quite elevated either way.
-
Jaymz
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm
#229
Post
by Jaymz » Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:09 pm
Exciting times!
So can someone please clarify regarding dwelling numbers. Does it mean 322 apartments plus 160 hotel rooms, or 322 including?
-
Ben
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7718
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#230
Post
by Ben » Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:15 pm
It is 322 plus hotel.
-
VinyTapestry849
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
#231
Post
by VinyTapestry849 » Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:38 pm
Nort wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
The king returns: Capture.JPG
lmao nort
-
VinyTapestry849
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
#232
Post
by VinyTapestry849 » Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:44 pm
Jaymz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:09 pm
Exciting times!
So can someone please clarify regarding dwelling numbers. Does it mean 322 apartments plus 160 hotel rooms, or 322 including?
Apartment to purchase : 322
Hotel : 160
Total of 482 rooms of which humans reside in lol
-
VinyTapestry849
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm
#233
Post
by VinyTapestry849 » Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:55 pm
Here's a more accurate vision of what it looks like in comparison to other highrises in the city. Even when its been shortened to 180m, It'll be an absolute Beast!
-
Attachments
-

-
ghs
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
- Location: Brighton
#234
Post
by ghs » Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:07 pm
HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:16 am
Great to hear! I have no doubt this one will go up in current economic conditions! This road desperately needs a tram line
Mate, how do you define good economic conditions ?
The economy is a shambles.
-
aceman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
- Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)
#235
Post
by aceman » Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:44 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:30 pm
The difference between SA1 Tower and previous tall proposals for Adelaide is that in this case the work has actually been done with regard to aviation. Previous proposals have made no attempt to do so and therefore had no chance of ever being approved at DA stage. This is the first time we've had a real project in Adelaide which will achieve height greater than the Westpac antennae. (Realm and Adelaidean are lower than Westpac antennae, with respect to sea level, which is what matters for aviation).
when you say the work has been done with regard to aviation does that mean that it has already been approved by the aviation authorities?
-
CDJ
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 2:30 pm
#236
Post
by CDJ » Tue Jan 18, 2022 10:01 pm
aceman wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:44 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:30 pm
The difference between SA1 Tower and previous tall proposals for Adelaide is that in this case the work has actually been done with regard to aviation. Previous proposals have made no attempt to do so and therefore had no chance of ever being approved at DA stage. This is the first time we've had a real project in Adelaide which will achieve height greater than the Westpac antennae. (Realm and Adelaidean are lower than Westpac antennae, with respect to sea level, which is what matters for aviation).
when you say the work has been done with regard to aviation does that mean that it has already been approved by the aviation authorities?
All will be revealed shortly. The full submission will be public in the next day or two and that will answer your question

-
citywatcher
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm
#237
Post
by citywatcher » Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:46 pm
ghs wrote:HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:16 am
Great to hear! I have no doubt this one will go up in current economic conditions! This road desperately needs a tram line
Mate, how do you define good economic conditions ?
The economy is a shambles.
He probably means Vanguard will buy it for their new Super arm .
Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
-
Algernon
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1661
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
- Location: Moravia
#238
Post
by Algernon » Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:55 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly.
The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
It looks like a phone exchange and a tyre and auto?
-
HiTouch
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
#239
Post
by HiTouch » Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:41 am
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
So it’ll have wind chimes and a tyre swing?
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#240
Post
by Ho Really » Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:02 am
Was waiting for this news since December. CDJ gave us a hint for something then. A little disappointed not pushed to the 200 metre limit, but beggars can't be choosers. Anyhow back in December I put this image together to see what reaction it would get but never posted it. A bit of an anti climax now I guess. Anyhow let's enjoy the moment.
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 10 guests