News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#886 Post by Wayno » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:33 am

david wrote:
NOTES FROM COUNCILLOR Issue 25.pdf
Issue 25 of my Notes on Council matters.
The conundrum of Harris Scarfe's and some thoughts on the State Government's 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide with Adelaide city as a 'supa TOD'

David
hi david, re VSQ, can you please provide more details about the 'Design Team'. thanks...

Also, should Council consider a tiered fee for renting parkland space depending upon the scale of the event? Larger events probably cause more damage and hence should pay an increased rental fee. I personally think it's great that our open spaces are being regularly used by the public - helps foster a larger sense of community in Adelaide residents. Maybe time for some events in the southern parklands to share the load around?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3106
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#887 Post by rhino » Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:21 am

David, thankyou for your notes, they were interesting to read.

Your mention of the "cool profit" made from the Festival of sounds (I gathered, from the way you wrote it, that you think they are not being charged enough for the use of the park), however, didn't take into account the cost of running the event, other than the cost of leasing the park. The profit may not look quite so cool in reality.
cheers,
Rhino

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#888 Post by AtD » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:04 pm

Yes, this is not the first time he has misrepresented revenue as profit. The two are vastly different concepts and vastly different figures. Just because the latter is huge, it doesn't mean the former is even above zero.

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#889 Post by david » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:46 pm

Re VSQ Design Team, unfortunately I am bound by confidentiality clauses until the contract is formally signed. But this should be any day soon and I would expect to see a media release as soon as possible.
David

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#890 Post by david » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:57 pm

AtD wrote:Yes, this is not the first time he has misrepresented revenue as profit. The two are vastly different concepts and vastly different figures. Just because the latter is huge, it doesn't mean the former is even above zero.
You used the word profit, I didn't! But the facts are, income from predicted ticket sales $680,000 (plus other sales on the day) compared to a Council fee of $2,500 for using Bonython Park for 3 days.

Perhaps the fees for such events should be based on the number of people attending, the impact on the event space, the length of the event and the number of days that the space is fenced off.

David

davideoeo
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:33 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#891 Post by davideoeo » Fri May 01, 2009 12:28 am

Regarding the façade of Harris Scarfe’s - this surely this must be saved. Here in the UK, places like Croydon in London knocked down their historical buildings, and in their place built at the time modern 60s high rises - it is now considered one of the most undesirable areas in London. The shine quickly wears of vacuous boxes.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#892 Post by monotonehell » Fri May 01, 2009 12:31 am

This event will attract 8000 fans at $80 each; a cool $680000 in return for a paltry fee to use Bonython Park!
8,000 X 80 = 640,000 ;)

In accounting the term "return" is generally accepted to mean "profit". So you can see where the confusion lies.

Anyway; I don't think we should be focusing on how much money the event makes. That's by the by. The real argument here is that an event organiser should be paying a fee commensurate with the amount of reparations needed after the event, plus a small margin so the parklands don't go backward.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Clr Yarwood
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:00 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#893 Post by Clr Yarwood » Fri May 01, 2009 8:50 pm

monotonehell wrote:a fee commensurate with the amount of reparations needed after the event, plus a small margin so the parklands don't go backward.
Could not one argue that a greater margin would see the parklands go forward faster – user pays?
Councillor Stephen Yarwood
Candidate for Lord Mayor
Adelaide City Council

http://www.StephenYarwood.com

User avatar
Clr Yarwood
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:00 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#894 Post by Clr Yarwood » Fri May 01, 2009 8:52 pm

FYI - On the 25th of April, ANZAC Day, Emily and I welcomed Oliver Alexander Stephen Yarwood.

Mum and Oliver are both doing very well – a public holiday for his birthday every year when the Australian spirit is celebrated and the bars do beer for breakfast…nice one Digger!
Councillor Stephen Yarwood
Candidate for Lord Mayor
Adelaide City Council

http://www.StephenYarwood.com

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#895 Post by monotonehell » Sat May 02, 2009 12:01 am

Clr Yarwood wrote:
monotonehell wrote:a fee commensurate with the amount of reparations needed after the event, plus a small margin so the parklands don't go backward.
Could not one argue that a greater margin would see the parklands go forward faster – user pays?
That's what I said. But being a terrible cynic I stated it in the negative while you stated it in the positive ;)
Clr Yarwood wrote:FYI - On the 25th of April, ANZAC Day, Emily and I welcomed Oliver Alexander Stephen Yarwood.

Mum and Oliver are both doing very well – a public holiday for his birthday every year when the Australian spirit is celebrated and the bars do beer for breakfast…nice one Digger!
Congratulations. Don't blink, he'll be 25 and off before you notice. ;)
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#896 Post by david » Sat May 02, 2009 12:21 am

NOTES FROM COUNCILLOR Issue 25.pdf
(736.25 KiB) Downloaded 199 times
The conundrum of Harris Scarfe's and some thoughts on the State Government's 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide with Adelaide city as a 'supa TOD'

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3106
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#897 Post by rhino » Mon May 04, 2009 7:40 am

Clr Yarwood wrote:FYI - On the 25th of April, ANZAC Day, Emily and I welcomed Oliver Alexander Stephen Yarwood.

Mum and Oliver are both doing very well – a public holiday for his birthday every year when the Australian spirit is celebrated and the bars do beer for breakfast…nice one Digger!
Congrats to all three of you! Fun times ahead!
cheers,
Rhino

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#898 Post by skyliner » Mon May 04, 2009 4:32 pm

After reading your information David I found that Adelaide's projected population for 30 yrs hence is 2m.with an increase of 560000 from now. Is it a fact that Adelaide now has 1 440 000. Currently I thought that it was well under 1 200 000 - where does your figure come from - surely not the Adelaide Statistical Division used by the ABS???

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#899 Post by Shuz » Mon May 04, 2009 6:24 pm

I thought it was under 1.1m? And if I want to get really technical, is actually under a million, if you count the extent of continous sprawl.

peachy
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: [] News: Adelaide City Council

#900 Post by peachy » Mon May 04, 2009 10:03 pm

According to Bureau of Stats projected population at 30 June 2008 of Adelaide by council (http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected] ... enDocument):

Adelaide City: 18,990
Inner City Councils
Prospect: 20,710
Walkerville: 7,258
Norwood: 35,893
Burnside: 44,010
Unley: 38,146
West Torrens: 55,064
Charles Sturt: 105,573 Total Inner City: 325,644
Mid City Councils
Port Adelaide: 109,922
Cambelltown: 48,593
Mitcham: 64,891
Marion: 82,971
Holdfast Bay: 35,525 Total Inner-Mid City: 667,546
Outer City Councils
Salisbury: 127,514
Tea Tree: 99,886
Playford: 75,323
Gawler: 20,257
Adelaide Hills: 39,703
Onkaparinga: 158,061 Total City: 1,188,290

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests